-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 288
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix Go feature set handling in editions for checks #3590
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This fixes the handling of the Go feature set in editions for use with checks. Dynamic types would cause the google.golang.org/protobuf library to panic when trying to fetch the Go feature extension. This is a temporary workaround until upstream can be resolved. See the issue: golang/protobuf#1669 When resolving file descriptors for checks, we now check for use of google/protobuf/go_features.proto and reparse extensions with a resolver targetted at the gofeaturespb package. This ensure the types will match the ones set in the extension type gofeaturespb.E_go. Fixes #3580
The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow Buf CI / buf (pull_request).
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this looks pretty good.
})...), | ||
) | ||
for _, descriptor := range reparseDescriptors { | ||
// We clone the FileDescriptorProto to avoid modifying the original. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this matter? This is an unexported method, not an exported helper. So do the call sites really re-use the original? If not, seems like a waste to generate an unnecessary copy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It will modify the image so anything using that would see it. I don't think it matters though this was just done to be defensive. For the lint/breaking checks the images aren't used elsewhere.
private/bufpkg/bufcheck/util.go
Outdated
fileDescriptorProto := &descriptorpb.FileDescriptorProto{} | ||
proto.Merge(fileDescriptorProto, descriptor.FileDescriptorProto) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you were to keep the defensive copy, why not just clone it?
fileDescriptorProto := &descriptorpb.FileDescriptorProto{} | |
proto.Merge(fileDescriptorProto, descriptor.FileDescriptorProto) | |
fileDescriptorProto := proto.Clone(descriptor.FileDescriptorProto).(*descriptorpb.FileDescriptorProto) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The linter complains about type assertion so used merge to defer the proto package to handle it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess //nolint
isn't accepted in this repo? 😞
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We use proto.Clone elsewhere with the two var destructor and error check. Now do the same here.
return &goFeaturesResolver{ | ||
Files: protoregistryFiles, | ||
Types: protoregistryTypes, | ||
}, nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is fine and safe right now. But this seems a little suspicious to copy these types by value. I think it might be less scary looking to instead define the var at the top:
var resolver goFeaturesResolver
And then use resolver.Files
and resolver.Types
to register everything and finally:
return &goFeaturesResolver
Not a blocking comment. Just my two cents... 🤷
assert.Panics(t, func() { | ||
// TODO: if this no longer panics, we can remove the code handling | ||
// this workaround in bufcheck.imageToProtoFileDescriptors. | ||
_, err := protodesc.NewFiles(fileSet) | ||
assert.NoError(t, err) | ||
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Co-authored-by: Joshua Humphries <[email protected]>
This fixes the handling of the Go feature set in editions for use with checks. Dynamic types would cause the google.golang.org/protobuf library to panic when trying to fetch the Go feature extension. This is a temporary workaround until upstream can be resolved. See the issue: golang/protobuf#1669
When resolving file descriptors for checks, we now check for use of google/protobuf/go_features.proto and reparse extensions with a resolver targetted at the gofeaturespb package. This ensure the types will match the ones set in the extension type gofeaturespb.E_go.
Fixes #3580