Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Go feature set handling in editions for checks #3590

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

emcfarlane
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes the handling of the Go feature set in editions for use with checks. Dynamic types would cause the google.golang.org/protobuf library to panic when trying to fetch the Go feature extension. This is a temporary workaround until upstream can be resolved. See the issue: golang/protobuf#1669

When resolving file descriptors for checks, we now check for use of google/protobuf/go_features.proto and reparse extensions with a resolver targetted at the gofeaturespb package. This ensure the types will match the ones set in the extension type gofeaturespb.E_go.

Fixes #3580

This fixes the handling of the Go feature set in editions for use with
checks. Dynamic types would cause the google.golang.org/protobuf
library to panic when trying to fetch the Go feature extension. This is
a temporary workaround until upstream can be resolved. See the issue:
golang/protobuf#1669

When resolving file descriptors for checks, we now check for use of
google/protobuf/go_features.proto and reparse extensions with a resolver
targetted at the gofeaturespb package. This ensure the types will match
the ones set in the extension type gofeaturespb.E_go.

Fixes #3580
@emcfarlane emcfarlane requested review from jhump and doriable January 14, 2025 00:40
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 14, 2025

The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow Buf CI / buf (pull_request).

BuildFormatLintBreakingUpdated (UTC)
✅ passed✅ passed✅ passed✅ passedJan 14, 2025, 4:30 PM

@emcfarlane emcfarlane marked this pull request as draft January 14, 2025 01:57
Copy link
Member

@jhump jhump left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this looks pretty good.

private/bufpkg/bufcheck/util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
})...),
)
for _, descriptor := range reparseDescriptors {
// We clone the FileDescriptorProto to avoid modifying the original.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this matter? This is an unexported method, not an exported helper. So do the call sites really re-use the original? If not, seems like a waste to generate an unnecessary copy.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It will modify the image so anything using that would see it. I don't think it matters though this was just done to be defensive. For the lint/breaking checks the images aren't used elsewhere.

Comment on lines 66 to 67
fileDescriptorProto := &descriptorpb.FileDescriptorProto{}
proto.Merge(fileDescriptorProto, descriptor.FileDescriptorProto)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you were to keep the defensive copy, why not just clone it?

Suggested change
fileDescriptorProto := &descriptorpb.FileDescriptorProto{}
proto.Merge(fileDescriptorProto, descriptor.FileDescriptorProto)
fileDescriptorProto := proto.Clone(descriptor.FileDescriptorProto).(*descriptorpb.FileDescriptorProto)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The linter complains about type assertion so used merge to defer the proto package to handle it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess //nolint isn't accepted in this repo? 😞

Copy link
Contributor Author

@emcfarlane emcfarlane Jan 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We use proto.Clone elsewhere with the two var destructor and error check. Now do the same here.

Comment on lines 278 to 281
return &goFeaturesResolver{
Files: protoregistryFiles,
Types: protoregistryTypes,
}, nil
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine and safe right now. But this seems a little suspicious to copy these types by value. I think it might be less scary looking to instead define the var at the top:

var resolver goFeaturesResolver

And then use resolver.Files and resolver.Types to register everything and finally:

return &goFeaturesResolver

Not a blocking comment. Just my two cents... 🤷

Comment on lines +178 to +183
assert.Panics(t, func() {
// TODO: if this no longer panics, we can remove the code handling
// this workaround in bufcheck.imageToProtoFileDescriptors.
_, err := protodesc.NewFiles(fileSet)
assert.NoError(t, err)
})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

emcfarlane and others added 2 commits January 14, 2025 10:31
@emcfarlane emcfarlane marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2025 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

lint panic with option features.(pb.go).api_level
2 participants