Fix example process definition in RFC 0093

RFC 0093 contains a number of examples of how to migrate a buildpack away from `direct=false` mode. One of these examples was missing the "bash" command prior to the "-c" argument. Signed-off-by: Ed Morley <[email protected]>
buildpacks · Apr 28, 2023 · 3086c83 · 3086c83
1 parent e27efb9
commit 3086c83
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/text/0093-remove-shell-processes.md b/text/0093-remove-shell-processes.md
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Using the new API this process could look like:
 ```
 [[processes]]
 type = "bash"
-command = ["-c", "dotnet", "my-app.dll", "--urls", "http://0.0.0.0:${PORT:-8080}"]
+command = ["bash", "-c", "dotnet", "my-app.dll", "--urls", "http://0.0.0.0:${PORT:-8080}"]
 default = true
 ```
 Things to note:
@@ -400,4 +400,4 @@ In addition to the changes described originally in 0093 we'd like some way of ve
 
 Why was this amendment necessary?
 
-The RFC text should reflect what was actually implemented / agreed upon to avoid confusion.
+The RFC text should reflect what was actually implemented / agreed upon to avoid confusion.