Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GAP-2251: MQ Conditional Logic - Choose organisation type #161

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 17, 2023

Conversation

ConorFayleTCO
Copy link
Contributor

@ConorFayleTCO ConorFayleTCO commented Nov 16, 2023

Description

GAP-2251 - move org type before name
GAP-2245 - add conditional logic on summary screen
GAP-2297 - fix back buttons in MQ flow
GAP-2298 - fix back buttons from submission

Related PRs:
cabinetoffice/gap-find-applicant-backend#56

Type of change

Please check the relevant options.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected).
  • This change requires a documentation update.

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes:

  • Unit Test

  • Integration Test (if applicable)

  • End to End Test (if applicable)

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Please attach screenshots of the change if it is a UI change:

Checklist:

  • [/] If I have listed depedenencies above, I have ensured that they are present in the target branch.
  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • [/] I have commented my code in hard-to-understand areas.
  • [/] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation where applicable.
  • [/] I have ran cypress tests and they all pass locally.

@ConorFayleTCO ConorFayleTCO merged commit 36bac43 into develop Nov 17, 2023
13 of 14 checks passed
@ConorFayleTCO ConorFayleTCO deleted the GAP-2251-choose-org-type branch November 17, 2023 11:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants