[DPE-3233] Apache Kafka <> OCI Factory Integration #155
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
deusebio
changed the title
deusebio
force-pushed
the
dpe-3233-kafka-oci-integration
branch
from
99b62c0
to
f5e5d06
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ping the @canonical/rocks team.
Description
We have recently created a Rock for packaging Apache Kafka. The binaries are the same as the ones used in Charmed Kafka images, but here we just reduce only to the Apache Kafka, leaving outside all the extra components and dependencies.
The idea of the image would be to replace the current Apache Kafka images in DockerHub that are not integrated with Rock and OCI Factory pipeline. With respect to that image, there is a UX difference, namely that the new image only provides a way to run Kafka. The previous image was also allowing to run ZooKeeper, but given we already have an Official ZooKeeper image, I would generally advice to use that one instead, without packaging here those binaries/entrypoints as well. In the documentation I provide guidance on how Kafka can easily be deployed along side a ZooKeeper container (using the Canonical offical ZooKeeper image)