Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds project specific excludes to the make entrypoint #273

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 16, 2024

Conversation

SecondSkoll
Copy link
Collaborator

Some similar work will need to be done when the vale action is done by GitHub actions, but this works for now. I attempted some more complicated logic, but limitations with make brought me back to this relatively basic approach.

Makefile.sp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Makefile.sp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
# This wordlist is from the Sphinx starter pack and should not be
# modified. Add any custom terms to .custom_wordlist.txt instead.
# Leave a blank line at the end to support concatenation.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add the blank line as well? ;)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, it does have one locally... Strange.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe you have Git configured to cut off blank lines at the end?

Makefile.sp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Ruth Fuchss <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@ru-fu ru-fu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume you've tested it?
I haven't, but it looks good to me. :)

Makefile.sp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@SecondSkoll
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ru-fu I have indeed tested it :)
I'm not 100% happy with the implementation, but it works so I think that will do for now. I think optimising our Vale implementation will come next cycle.

@SecondSkoll SecondSkoll merged commit 845e02e into canonical:main Aug 16, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants