-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 29 review #2694
Release 29 review #2694
Conversation
debian/source/lintian-overrides
Outdated
# Lintian doesn't see dh-systemd alternative when building on xenial | ||
ubuntu-advantage-tools: missing-build-dependency-for-dh_-command dh_systemd_start => dh-systemd | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This lintian override still overrides the warning when building on xenial - do we care about this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sergiodj we have some lintian warnings that happen on older releases only, and those overrides cause the 'unecessary' messages you saw. How do you think we should best approach this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question. I believe it's OK leaving the override, then. Although I don't see any of us building the package manually on Xenial, it's still a good idea to document a behaviour that happens there because we still support the distro.
Thanks, guys. I left two comments which I hope can clarify questions raised by @renanrodrigo and @orndorffgrant. Otherwise, this PR LGTM. |
Calling systemctl on the postinst script generates a lintian warning. We are replacing it for deb-systemd-invoke to silence it
3ed3aee
to
c602233
Compare
@sergiodj @orndorffgrant @renanrodrigo updated |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We got rant in the past because changes to the changelog should be in separate commits than the changes themselves. But if @sergiodj is fine as is, so am I!
No description provided.