feat(arch-linux): init

[claymorwan]

🎉 Theme for Arch user repository 🎉

The Arch user repository (aur) is a community-driven repository of packages for Arch Linux.

💬 Additional Comments 💬

I had a bit of struggle making this theme since it was my first time working with userstyles, but I made it in a day so it's fine. My only problem at the moment is changing the logo for a themed one, or at least a transparent one.

🗒 Checklist 🗒

• I have read and followed Catppuccin's submission guidelines.
• I have made a new directory underneath /styles/<name-of-website> containing the contents of the /template directory.
  • I have ensured that the new directory is in lower-kebab-case.
  • I have followed the template and kept the preprocessor as LESS.
• I have made sure to update the
  userstyles.yml
  file with information about the new userstyle.
• I have included the following files:
  • catppuccin.user.css - all the CSS for the userstyle, based on the
    template.
  • preview.webp - composite image of all four individual flavor screenshots (taken with the default accent color of mauve) stitched together, generated via Catwalk.

[GenShibe]

In terms of the logo, my first thought is to take the SVG off of the arch wiki style, and then using that as a base to add the words "user repository"

[claymorwan]

Well I already took the argo logo and changed the accent color, tho I haven't been able to insert it correctly and hide the original logo

Btw I think I gotta do a new commit to fix the requested changes or nah ? I don't do pr often so idk

[claymorwan]

Ok I think I got everything fixed

[isabelroses]

First off, thanks for the PR :).

It would be nice to theme visited links.

The red here is not catppuccin themed.

Package keywords are a bit hard to read, and would likely be worse if my accent matched the blue, could we use crust on those.

[claymorwan]

I think I fixed everything now, tho idk about that conflict, tried to fix it by adding what was conflicting to the file

[claymorwan]

I think I fixed everything now, tho idk about that conflict, tried something but didn't worked

[claymorwan]

why's it broken again

[claymorwan]

So like, is it good now ? Or is there something else to change ?

[uncenter]

At the core yes. I'm still seeing some unthemed or incorrectly themed things:

On a page like https://archlinux.org/download/, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/follow-appimage, or just https://archlinux.org/packages/, the primary layer is the box in the center, which should have a background of base instead of surface1. Area around the box should be mantle.

The text of the current page/tab in the header is unthemed.

On the home page, wiki, and security page: lots of unthemed dashed/solid horizontal lines/borders.

High vulnerability severity text on the security page is unthemed (should be peach, class is .orange):

[claymorwan]

On a page like https://archlinux.org/download/, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/follow-appimage, or just https://archlinux.org/packages/, the primary layer is the box in the center, which should have a background of base instead of surface1. Area around the box should be mantle.

So you mean change every .box to have base as background, and every background of the page as mantle ?
Like that ?

On the home page, wiki, and security page: lots of unthemed dashed/solid horizontal lines/borders.

Been trying to theme these but I have no idea how to, tried border-color but nah

[uncenter]

So you mean change every .box to have base as background, and every background of the page as mantle ?

Yep just like that.

Been trying to theme these but I have no idea how to, tried border-color but nah

border-bottom-color of: #news h4 for the dotted ones. .mw-heading1, h1, .mw-heading2, h2 for the solid wiki ones.

[claymorwan]

Chat is it gud

[GitMuslim]

I'm not sure why you've requested a review from me, but either way looks good.

Though I thought we already had an aur theme, or was that for the wiki?

[uncenter]

I'm not sure why you've requested a review from me, but either way looks good.

Though I thought we already had an aur theme, or was that for the wiki?

They accidentally deleted the folder for the Stylus userstyle, triggering the CI to request a review from you since you maintain that.

And yes we did, it was for the wiki. If you follow the chain of events above I suggested combining the proposed Arch User Repository userstyle with the existing Arch Wiki userstyle to create a unified Arch Linux userstyle, and that is what we have now here.

[GitMuslim]

I suggested combining the proposed Arch User Repository userstyle with the existing Arch Wiki userstyle to create a unified Arch Linux userstyle, and that is what we have now here.

Sounds good.

[claymorwan]

So do I have to do stuff again for the pr or nah ?

[uncenter]

So do I have to do stuff again for the pr or nah ?

Nothing right now, just needs reviewing.

[claymorwan]

So do I have to do stuff again for the pr or nah ?

Nothing right now, just needs reviewing.

Oki, I'll be waiting then

[claymorwan]

O wairt bu reviewing does that mean Inhabe to do the "request review" thingy

[uncenter]

Nope, nothing you need to do right now.