Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
BabyRudin: Solution: Ex08 in Ch01
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
ceciliachan1979 committed Jan 13, 2024
1 parent 21dc186 commit 42021d9
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 42 additions and 0 deletions.
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions Books/BabyRudin/BabyRudin.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,5 +11,7 @@

\section*{Ch01 - The Real and Complex Number Systems}
\input{Chapter01/ex01.tex}
\input{Chapter01/ex08.cecilia.tex}
\input{Chapter01/ex08.gapry.tex}

\end{document}
29 changes: 29 additions & 0 deletions Books/BabyRudin/Chapter01/ex08.cecilia.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
\subsection*{Exercise 08 (Cecilia)}
After definition 1.26, Rudin identifies the complex number $ (a, 0) $ as the real number $ a $ on the basis that arithmetic of $ (a, 0) $ and $ a $ are compatible. However, that does not say anything about the ordering of the complex numbers.
In fact, suppose an ordering exist, it might be the case that the ordering of $ (a, 0) $ is not compatible with the ordering of $ a $, so identification could be confusing. In the sequel, we will not use the identification, and use the ordered pair representation instead.

Suppose (for contradiction) that an ordering of complex number can be defined.

First, we show that $ (-1, 0) > (0, 0) $ is false. Suppose $ (-1, 0) > (0, 0) $, we have:

\begin{eqnarray*}
(-1, 0) &>& (0, 0) \\
(-1, 0) + (1, 0) &>& (0, 0) + (1, 0) \\
(0, 0) &>& (1, 0)
\end{eqnarray*}

\begin{eqnarray*}
(-1, 0) &>& (0, 0) \\
(-1, 0)(-1, 0) &>& (0, 0)(-1, 0) \\
(1, 0) &>& (0, 0)
\end{eqnarray*}

Apparently these two facts contradict each other. Therefore, $ (-1, 0) > (0, 0) $ is false.

With that result, suppose the complex number can be assigned an order so that it becomes an ordered field. Then we know that either $ i > (0, 0) $ or $ i < (0, 0) $.

Suppose $ i > (0, 0) $, then $ i^2 > (0, 0) $, which means $ (-1, 0) > (0, 0) $, which is false.

Otherwise suppose $ i < (0, 0) $, then $ (0, 0) = i - i < -i $, which means $ (0, 0) < (-i)^2 $, which means $ (0, 0) < (-1, 0) $, which is false.

Therefore we have a contradiction and it is impossible to impose an order on the complex numbers so that it becomes an ordered field.
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions Books/BabyRudin/Chapter01/ex08.gapry.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
\subsection*{Exercise 08 (Gapry)}
Let $c_1 = i = (0,\ 1)$ are the ordered pair in the complex field $\mathbb{C}$

\begin{enumerate}
\item{$1 > 0$ (by 1.18d) }
\item{$-1 < 0$ (by 1.18a applied on (1))}
\item{$c_1^2 = i^2 = -1 \implies i \neq 0 \implies i^2 > 0 \implies -1 > 0$ (by 1.18d)}
\end{enumerate}

Obviously, 2. and 3. are contradictory.

0 comments on commit 42021d9

Please sign in to comment.