Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring of AeroFrame module #301

Open
wants to merge 23 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

GBenedett
Copy link
Collaborator

Improve the existing AeroFrame module, replacing PyTornado with PyAVL

@GBenedett GBenedett added PyTornado Related to PyTornado AVL Related to AVL Aeroelasticity labels Jun 13, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 7.17703% with 194 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 61.57%. Comparing base (1b7ff5c) to head (ee65b5c).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ceasiompy/AeroFrame_new/aeroframe_run.py 0.00% 189 Missing ⚠️
ceasiompy/PyAVL/func/avlresults.py 42.85% 4 Missing ⚠️
ceasiompy/PyAVL/avlrun.py 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #301      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.75%   61.57%   -1.19%     
==========================================
  Files          96       97       +1     
  Lines        9602     9799     +197     
==========================================
+ Hits         6026     6034       +8     
- Misses       3576     3765     +189     
Flag Coverage Δ
integrationtests 44.45% <7.17%> (-1.04%) ⬇️
unittests 50.24% <4.87%> (-1.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Aeroelasticity AVL Related to AVL PyTornado Related to PyTornado
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants