Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix dyno resolving explicit use of tagged iterators #25995

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

riftEmber
Copy link
Member

@riftEmber riftEmber commented Sep 25, 2024

Enable Dyno to resolve explicit calls to a tagged iterator variant.

This functionality is used in standard modules for iterator forwarding (ChapelDomain example).

Done by pre-empting the usual iterator resolution process, which selects between serial and parallel variants based on how it's used, for the case of an iterator call with a tag param.

Resolves https://github.com/Cray/chapel-private/issues/6720.

[reviewer info placeholder]

To be merged after #25994 which makes some more significant changes to resolving iterators first.

Testing:

  • paratest
  • dyno tests

@riftEmber riftEmber marked this pull request as draft September 25, 2024 20:16
@riftEmber riftEmber changed the title Fix dyno resolving serial use of parallel tagged iterator Fix dyno resolving explicit use of tagged iterators Sep 26, 2024
@riftEmber riftEmber marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2024 18:30
@riftEmber riftEmber force-pushed the dyno-tagged-iter branch 2 times, most recently from e815089 to 5e63a71 Compare September 26, 2024 19:45
@riftEmber riftEmber force-pushed the dyno-tagged-iter branch 4 times, most recently from f11fd66 to 1e79196 Compare September 30, 2024 18:00
@riftEmber
Copy link
Member Author

Closing as problem is better solved in #26023, which also rolls in the added test case

@riftEmber riftEmber closed this Oct 1, 2024
@riftEmber riftEmber deleted the dyno-tagged-iter branch October 1, 2024 17:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant