Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove last ekt reference #677

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2024
Merged

remove last ekt reference #677

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

pabuhler
Copy link
Member

@pabuhler pabuhler commented Jan 8, 2024

Preserve the invalid policy test so more can be added.
Merge srtp_valid_policy and srtp_validate_policy_master_keys functions.

Preserve the invalid policy test so more can be added.
Merge srtp_valid_policy and srtp_validate_policy_master_keys functions.
Copy link
Contributor

@paulej paulej left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should create an EKT implementation for the public outside of libsrtp. I've written one in C++, but it likely needs work to make it robust. I do like EKT, though. Sadly, the RFC does not include conveying keys in RTCP, which is needed for a complete solution, IMO.

@pabuhler
Copy link
Member Author

pabuhler commented Jan 9, 2024

Maybe we should create an EKT implementation for the public outside of libsrtp. I've written one in C++, but it likely needs work to make it robust. I do like EKT, though. Sadly, the RFC does not include conveying keys in RTCP, which is needed for a complete solution, IMO.

Been a while since I looked at the final EKT draft, but not against even adding it back again if it makes sense. This was just clean up from before first.

@pabuhler pabuhler merged commit 97015dc into cisco:main Jan 9, 2024
33 checks passed
@pabuhler pabuhler deleted the remove-ekt branch January 9, 2024 07:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants