-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removes busy waiting thread in CLIJxPool by using ArrayBlockingQueue #3
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Puts Util class as an inner class of CLIJxFilterOp Removes powerpool method in CLIJxPool Adds self contained DemoDummyFiltering Moves Lazy class as inner class of DemoDummyFiltering Removes N5 dependencies and associated demo and classes pom.xml: - puts SNAPSHOT suffix in version - comment scijava app directory since it is dev specific - removes non working N5 dependencies - removes unused picocli dependecy - put bdv-vistools dependency scope as test Ignores tests since they are highly dependent on the hardware of the developer Removes uncompiling demo depending on N5
Hi @haesleinhuepf , I made a second commit which fixes the dependency issues, essentially by removing every aspect of this repo which depends on N5: - IMO it's not a IO package and it should depend as little as possible on IO packages. I've instead updated the previous demo with a self-contained demo that should work for everybody, provided that a compatible CLIJ GPU is available. The commit changes a lot of things as far as the demo is concerned, but should remain fully compatible as far as the pool of CLIJ objects is concerned. I'm very excited about releasing multi-GPU deconv in Fiji and this repo is a blocking point. Please when you have time let me know if this PR has a chance to be accepted in a not too distant future. Otherwise I could probably go around it by making another CLIJ pool class but that's not optimal. Cheers, Nicolas Here's a recap of the changes:
Changes package location of CLIJxFilterOp
|
(Note: I also have suggestions regarding the way pools are defined) |
Hi @NicoKiaru , thanks for working on this! I must admit, I don't fully understand why so many files are deleted in this PR, and I'm not sure if the result remains a good demonstration of distributed / lazy image computing. I have less and less time to work on Java projects btw. Hence I'm curious if you would be interested in taking this repository over and making it yours? Your changes seem very useful! Thanks! Best, |
I'd be perfectly happy!
There's one, it's using the same dummy filteinr. Just it does not depend on N5 since there are build issues. Also I made it self-contained (it's downloading data and caching from a Zenodo repo). There's no way I could ran the other demo. |
Thanks for the fast response! |
Hey @haesleinhuepf !
It's a combo PR / issue report. I'm trying to use your gpu pool instead of writing a new implementation. My goal is to use @bnorthan GPU deconvolution and make it compatible with multiple GPUs (clij/clij2-fft#37)
Regarding this PR:
Finally, I couldn't test any of that, since the N5 dependencies do not compile:
Personally I had a lot of issues with N5 dependencies, and I think it's a good idea to avoid depending on them while they are not fully stabilized, even more when the repo does not deal directly with IO.
What's your opinion on these points ?