Bug fix in ROSA HCP filter

[vishnuchalla]

Type of change

• Refactor
• New feature
• Bug fix
• Optimization
• Documentation Update

Description

While looking at the some of the worker-scale workload results, noticed that rosa HCP runs are not being filtered properly. So, adding a fix for that.

Checklist before requesting a review

• I have performed a self-review of my code.
• If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.

Testing

Tested using local-compose.sh

Before this change

After this change

[dbutenhof]

I don't know enough about the intended ROSA filter behavior to "approve" or object, but minor comments ...

[dbutenhof]

Can you fix the CI? It'd be nice not to have this go onto main with the broken checks. (We don't have much of a CI, so let's at least keep what we've got passing.)

Then Varshini can merge main into her branch before we talk about how to bring revamp back onto main. (And following that, my whole chain of Crucible/ILAB changes which includes at least a start on real unit testing ... and some formatting and lint checks.)

[vishnuchalla]

Can you fix the CI? It'd be nice not to have this go onto main with the broken checks. (We don't have much of a CI, so let's at least keep what we've got passing.)

Then Varshini can merge main into her branch before we talk about how to bring revamp back onto main. (And following that, my whole chain of Crucible/ILAB changes which includes at least a start on real unit testing ... and some formatting and lint checks.)

Sure. Poetry is fixed. Had to rewrite based on Poetry 2.0 latest syntax.

[chentex]

/lgtm

[dbutenhof]

@vishnuchalla ... you have two approvals. You tagged @jtaleric for review -- do you want to wait, or should we just get this in? I want @MVarshini to be able to merge this into revamp so we can get her remaining refactoring merged and move ahead...

[vishnuchalla]

@vishnuchalla ... you have two approvals. You tagged @jtaleric for review -- do you want to wait, or should we just get this in? I want @MVarshini to be able to merge this into revamp so we can get her remaining refactoring merged and move ahead...

Lets wait for a day for @jtaleric 's review. Since this is a small change, I think we are good to go for a merge.