opt: more fieldmask API #146
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HeyJavaBean
previously approved these changes
Nov 27, 2023
AsterDY
changed the title
SetFieldMask to Set_FieldMask
HeyJavaBean
previously approved these changes
Nov 29, 2023
AsterDY
force-pushed
the
feat/rename_fieldmask_api
branch
from
aefa4de to
474dbef
Compare
HeyJavaBean
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
SetFieldMask()toSet_FieldMask()to avoid conflict with user field nameMarshal()/Unmarshal()for transporting fieldmaskFieldMaskHalfwayto support mask for not-root structMotivation and Context
Related Issue