Draft: Twitter bot service #6
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I need to test this. Will try to do today. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit introduces a preliminary draft for implementing the Twitter bot. Changes include:
Adding a new method
respond_to_mentionsto theTwitterBotclass, utilizing thetweepyAPI to fetch current mentions and respond to them using the ChatGPT API.Creation of
twitter_bot_service.pycontaining the source code for running the bot.Updating the
startmethod of theTwitterBotto execute a while loop every 5 minutes, invoking therespond_to_mentions method.As mentioned in my previous pull request (#4) I have no way to actually test these changes since the Access Level for my current twitter API keys is not sufficient enough. Moreover I am also unaware as to how Numainda currently handles it interactions with the ChatGPT API and what instruction prompt it provides to it, so I have left that empty for now.
Any suggestions/improvements would be appreciated!