Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CORE-20721: RBAC Group Resource DB implementation #6257

Merged

Conversation

Tom-Fitzpatrick
Copy link
Contributor

@Tom-Fitzpatrick Tom-Fitzpatrick commented Jul 4, 2024

Completes the implementation of the RBAC Group Rest Resource, adding the db side of the implementation with unit tests.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 4, 2024

@corda-jenkins-ci02
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins build for PR 6257 build 6

Build Successful:
Jar artifact version produced by this PR: 5.3.0.0-alpha-1720105726260
Helm chart version produced by this PR: 5.3.0-alpha.1720105726260
Helm chart pushed to: oci://corda-os-docker-dev.software.r3.com/helm-charts/pr-6257/corda
Helm chart Polaris score: 82

@Tom-Fitzpatrick Tom-Fitzpatrick marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2024 15:37
@Tom-Fitzpatrick Tom-Fitzpatrick requested a review from a team as a code owner July 4, 2024 15:37
@Tom-Fitzpatrick Tom-Fitzpatrick self-assigned this Jul 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@vkolomeyko vkolomeyko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Tom-Fitzpatrick Tom-Fitzpatrick merged commit eacdfd1 into release/os/5.3 Jul 5, 2024
5 checks passed
@Tom-Fitzpatrick Tom-Fitzpatrick deleted the tomf/CORE-20721/rbac-group-db-implementation branch July 5, 2024 11:14
emilybowe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2024
Completes the implementation of the RBAC Group Rest Resource, adding the db side of the implementation with unit tests.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants