refactor(x/gov)!: migrate to use env var #19481
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates encompass significant changes aimed at enhancing context management, refining gas configuration, and improving the message routing system. A notable shift from Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (27)
- baseapp/msg_service_router.go (1 hunks)
- core/appmodule/environment.go (1 hunks)
- core/gas/meter.go (2 hunks)
- runtime/gas.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/abci_test.go (13 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/depinject.go (3 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/abci.go (14 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/common_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/deposit.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/hooks_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/keeper.go (5 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go (9 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/proposal.go (7 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/vote.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/module.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/types/v1beta1/content.go (2 hunks)
- x/params/depinject.go (2 hunks)
- x/params/keeper/common_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/params/keeper/keeper.go (3 hunks)
- x/params/keeper/keeper_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/params/proposal_handler.go (2 hunks)
- x/params/types/subspace.go (10 hunks)
- x/params/types/subspace_test.go (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 73
core/appmodule/environment.go (1)
- 20-20: The addition of
TransientStoreServiceto theEnvironmentstruct is a positive change, enhancing the struct's utility by providing access to a transient store service. This aligns well with the PR's objectives of improving configuration and operational flexibility.x/gov/types/v1beta1/content.go (2)
- 3-3: The update to the import statement, replacing
"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types"with"context", is appropriate for the migration towards usingcontext.Context. This change supports the PR's goal of enhancing modularity and testability.- 20-20: Modifying the
Handlerfunction signature to usecontext.Contextinstead ofsdk.Contextis a significant improvement, aligning with modern Go practices and the PR's objectives to enhance the governance module's flexibility and testability.x/params/keeper/common_test.go (2)
- 10-10: The addition of the
runtimeimport is necessary for the use ofruntime.NewEnvironment, which is part of the refactor to enhance configuration flexibility through environment variables.- 22-22: Creating the
envvariable usingruntime.NewEnvironmentand passing it toparamskeeper.NewKeeperis a key change that aligns with the PR's objectives. This enhances the modularity and configurability of the keeper by leveraging environment-based configurations.x/params/proposal_handler.go (2)
- 17-17: Updating the
NewParamChangeProposalHandlerfunction to usecontext.Contextis a significant improvement, aligning with the PR's objectives to enhance the governance module's flexibility and testability.- 28-28: The update to
handleParameterChangeProposalto usecontext.Contextsupports the PR's goal of improving modularity and testability by adopting standard Go contexts. This is a positive change.core/gas/meter.go (2)
- 28-28: Adding the
GetGasConfigmethod to theServiceinterface is a crucial change that enhances the gas management system's flexibility by allowing dynamic retrieval of gas configurations.- 39-47: The introduction of the
GasConfigstruct with various gas cost fields represents a structured approach to managing gas configurations, aligning with the PR's objectives to improve configuration management.x/params/depinject.go (2)
- 33-33: Adding the
envfield toModuleInputsis a key change that enhances the module's configuration flexibility by incorporating environment-based configurations.- 49-49: Updating the
ProvideModulefunction to passin.envas a parameter tokeeper.NewKeeperaligns with the PR's objectives, enhancing the modularity and configurability of the keeper.x/params/keeper/keeper.go (3)
- 18-18: The addition of the
environmentfield to theKeeperstruct is a positive change, enhancing the keeper's configuration flexibility by incorporating environment-based configurations.- 26-26: Updating the
NewKeeperfunction signature to includeenv appmodule.Environmentas a parameter aligns with the PR's objectives, enhancing the modularity and configurability of the keeper.- 38-39: Modifying the
Loggermethod to takecontext.Contextinstead ofsdk.Contextand to access the logger from theenvironmentfield supports the PR's goal of improving modularity and testability.x/gov/keeper/vote.go (1)
- 81-85: The update in the
AddVotefunction to utilizek.environment.EventService.EventManager(ctx).Emit(&v1.Vote{...})for event emission is a significant improvement, aligning with the PR's objectives to enhance the modularity and testability of event management.x/gov/depinject.go (2)
- 41-41: Replacing
store.KVStoreServicewithappmodule.EnvironmentinModuleInputsis a key change that enhances the module's configuration flexibility by incorporating environment-based configurations.- 79-79: Updating the parameter passed to
keeper.NewKeeperfromin.StoreServicetoin.Environmentaligns with the PR's objectives, enhancing the modularity and configurability of the keeper.runtime/gas.go (2)
- 33-35: Adding the
GetGasConfigmethod toGasServiceis a crucial change that enhances the gas management system's flexibility by allowing dynamic retrieval of gas configurations.- 106-137: The introduction of the
GasConfigstruct with methods to access various gas costs represents a structured approach to managing gas configurations, aligning with the PR's objectives to improve configuration management.x/gov/keeper/hooks_test.go (2)
- 86-86: Replacing calls to
gov.EndBlocker(ctx, govKeeper)withgovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)in the test scenario is a positive change, aligning with the PR's objectives to enhance the modularity and testability of the governance module.- 106-106: The update to invoke
govKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)directly in the test scenario supports the PR's goal of improving modularity and testability by adopting a more straightforward and consistent approach to function invocation.tests/integration/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
- 110-110: The modification to initialize
govKeeperwithruntime.NewEnvironmentincorporatinglog.NewNopLogger()is a positive change towards standardizing environment and logging handling in tests. Ensure this approach is consistently applied across other tests for uniformity.x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (1)
- 152-154: The introduction of the
GetGasConfigmethod in thegasServicestruct and its integration into theGetGasMetermethod is a commendable enhancement for dynamic gas configuration management. Consider adding tests to validate this new functionality and ensure it integrates seamlessly without introducing regressions.tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (1)
- 176-176: Switching to directly call the
EndBlockerfunction froms2.GovKeeperenhances test scenario control and precision. Ensure this approach is consistently applied in similar test scenarios for clarity and maintainability.x/params/types/subspace_test.go (3)
- 29-29: Adding the
envfield to theSubspaceTestSuitestruct and utilizing it intypes.NewSubspaceinitialization is a positive step towards aligning the test suite with the main codebase's architectural changes. Ensure the environment setup is consistently applied across the test suite and consider adding tests to validate the new setup.- 47-47: The use of the
envparameter intypes.NewSubspaceinitialization withinSetupTestfunction enhances the test suite's alignment with environment-based configurations. Verify that this approach does not introduce unintended side effects and consider adding tests for the new environment setup.- 58-58: Utilizing the
envparameter intypes.NewSubspaceinitialization within theTestKeyTablefunction is consistent with the test suite's move towards environment-based configurations. Ensure this approach is uniformly applied and consider adding tests to validate the environment setup.x/gov/keeper/common_test.go (2)
- 99-99: The introduction of the
environmentvariable usingruntime.NewEnvironment(storeService, log.NewNopLogger())is a key part of the refactor to leverage environment variables for configuration. This change aligns with the PR's objectives and represents a significant architectural shift towards more flexible and modular code. Ensure that this new approach is consistently applied and integrated across the module.- 134-134: The use of the
environmentvariable in thekeeper.NewKeeperfunction call marks a significant change in how thegovKeeperis initialized, moving towards a more environment and context-aware setup. This change is crucial for the refactor's goal to enhance configuration flexibility. It's important to ensure that all related components are updated to support this new initialization pattern.x/gov/module.go (1)
- 209-209: Simplifying the
EndBlockmethod by directly callingEndBlockerfrom thekeeperfield is a positive change that contributes to making the codebase more concise and maintainable. This approach enhances code clarity and aligns with best practices.baseapp/msg_service_router.go (1)
- 55-55: Updating the
MsgServiceHandlertype definition to usecontext.Contextinstead ofsdk.Contextaligns with the PR's objectives to adopt standard Go contexts. This change is crucial for enhancing interoperability and aligning the codebase with standard Go practices.x/gov/keeper/proposal.go (5)
- 13-13: The addition of the
"cosmossdk.io/core/event"import is appropriate given the changes to event management in the file.- 119-119: The replacement of
sdkCtx.HeaderInfo().Timewithk.environment.HeaderService.GetHeaderInfo(ctx).Timecorrectly aligns with the migration towards usingcontext.Contextand the new environment-based approach for accessing header information. This change should maintain the original functionality while adhering to the new architectural design.- 139-142: The update from
sdkCtx.EventManager().EmitEventtok.environment.EventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKVis in line with the refactor towards using environment variables and services for event management. This change should enhance modularity and testability by decoupling event emission from the SDK context. Ensure that all event attributes are correctly migrated and that the new method supports all required functionalities.- 181-181: The use of
k.environment.HeaderService.GetHeaderInfo(ctx).Timefor obtaining the current time from the header information is consistent with the refactor's objectives. This change ensures that the keeper methods remain decoupled from the SDK context, aligning with the goal of enhancing modularity and flexibility.- 246-246: The migration to use
k.environment.HeaderService.GetHeaderInfo(ctx).Timefor setting the start time of the voting period is correctly implemented. This adjustment is part of the broader refactor to utilizecontext.Contextand environment services, which is expected to improve the codebase's structure and maintainability.x/params/types/subspace.go (9)
- 4-4: The addition of
contextto the imports is necessary due to the migration fromsdk.Contexttocontext.Context. This change is foundational for the subsequent modifications in this file.- 8-8: The import of
"cosmossdk.io/core/appmodule"is required for accessing theappmodule.Environmentstructure, which is central to the refactor. This change is appropriate and aligns with the migration objectives.- 29-29: Adding the
environmentfield of typeappmodule.Environmentto theSubspacestruct is a crucial part of the refactor, enabling the use of environment variables and services for store access and parameter management. This change is consistent with the goal of enhancing modularity and flexibility.- 38-41: The modification of the
NewSubspacefunction signature to include theenv appmodule.Environmentparameter is necessary for initializing theSubspacestruct with the new environment context. This change is correctly implemented and essential for the refactor.- 93-93: The update to use
context.Contextin theValidatemethod is part of the broader migration fromsdk.Context. This change is correctly applied and aligns with the refactor's objectives to utilize standard Go contexts for better flexibility and modularity.- 111-112: The use of
s.environment.KVStoreService.OpenKVStore(ctx)for accessing the KV store in theGetmethod represents a significant shift towards using environment services for store operations. This change is in line with the refactor's goals but requires ensuring that theOpenKVStoremethod correctly handles context and store access patterns previously managed bysdk.Context.- 121-123: Similarly, the
GetIfExistsmethod's migration to usecontext.Contextands.environment.KVStoreService.OpenKVStore(ctx)is correctly implemented, aligning with the refactor's objectives. This change maintains the method's functionality while adapting it to the new architectural design.- 192-194: The
Setmethod's adaptation to usecontext.Contextand environment services for store access is another example of the refactor's impact on parameter management. This change is correctly implemented, ensuring that parameter setting operations are aligned with the new design principles.- 210-216: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [213-222]
The
Updatemethod's changes, including the use ofcontext.Contextand environment services for store operations, are correctly applied. This method's adaptation is crucial for maintaining the functionality of parameter updates within the new architectural framework.x/gov/keeper/keeper.go (5)
- 10-10: The addition of
"cosmossdk.io/core/appmodule"to the imports is necessary for accessing theappmodule.Environmentstructure, which is central to the refactor in this file. This change is appropriate and aligns with the migration objectives.- 52-52: Adding the
environmentfield of typeappmodule.Environmentto theKeeperstruct is a key part of the refactor, enabling the use of environment variables and services for enhanced modularity and flexibility. This change is correctly implemented.- 92-96: The update to the
NewKeeperfunction, including the addition of theenv appmodule.Environmentparameter and the assignment ofstoreServiceusingenv.KVStoreService, is crucial for initializing theKeeperwith the new environment context. This change is correctly applied and essential for the refactor.- 122-122: The assignment of the
environmentfield in theKeeperconstructor is correctly implemented, ensuring that theKeeperis initialized with the necessary environment context for subsequent operations. This change is in line with the refactor's goals.- 182-182: The modification of the
Loggermethod to usek.environment.Loggerinstead of the SDK context-based logger represents a shift towards using environment services for logging. This change is in line with the refactor's objectives to enhance modularity and maintainability.x/params/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)
- 20-20: The addition of the
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/runtimeimport aligns with the PR's objective to enhance configuration flexibility through environment variables. This change is necessary for the subsequent use ofruntime.NewEnvironmentin the test setup.- 37-41: The modification to initialize
suite.paramsKeepernow includes anenvparameter, created usingruntime.NewEnvironment. This change is crucial for integrating the new environment-based configuration approach. It's important to ensure that all dependent tests and functionalities are updated to accommodate this new initialization pattern, as it introduces a dependency on theruntimepackage for environment management.x/gov/keeper/abci.go (4)
- 20-20: The
EndBlockerfunction signature has been updated to usecontext.Contextinstead ofsdk.Context. This change aligns with the PR's objective to migrate towards a more standard and flexible context management approach. Ensure that all calls toEndBlockerand related logic are updated to usecontext.Context.- 23-27: The introduction of
logger := k.Logger(ctx)and the use ofk.environment.HeaderService.GetHeaderInfo(ctx).Timefor creating a rangerngdemonstrate the integration of the new environment-based configuration. It's important to ensure that theLoggerandHeaderServiceare correctly initialized in theKeeper's environment to prevent runtime errors.Verification successful
Given the widespread use of
NewEnvironmentacross various modules and tests, including the main application setup insimapp/app.go, it's evident that the environment, includingLoggerand potentiallyHeaderService, is being initialized as part of the application's runtime environment. However, the direct evidence linking thegovmodule'sKeeperto this initialization pattern is not explicitly shown in the provided output. To conclusively verify the initialization within thegovmodule'sKeeper, further investigation into thegovmodule's setup or the application configuration where thegovmodule'sKeeperis initialized would be necessary.
The provided output confirms that the
govmodule'sKeeperis initialized with anappmodule.Environment, as shown in theNewKeeperfunction within thegov/keeper/keeper.gofile. This initialization pattern is consistent across the application and suggests that essential components, includingLoggerand potentiallyHeaderService, are part of the environment setup. While the output does not explicitly detail the initialization ofLoggerandHeaderService, the use ofEnvironmentand the application's architectural pattern strongly imply their inclusion. Therefore, the original review comment's concern about ensuring correct initialization of these components in theKeeper's environment is supported by the evidence.* 76-79: The update in event emission logic, moving from direct SDK context access to utilizing the environment's event service, marks a significant improvement towards a more decoupled and testable event management system. Ensure that the `EventService` is correctly initialized and that all event emissions throughout the governance module have been updated to use this new approach.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the initialization of Logger and HeaderService in the Keeper's environment. rg --type go "NewEnvironment"Length of output: 7786
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Investigate the initialization of the gov module's Keeper, focusing on the environment setup. rg --type go -A 5 "NewKeeper" | grep -B 5 -A 10 "gov"Length of output: 16055
Verification successful
The verification process confirms that the
EventServiceis correctly initialized and utilized across the governance module for event emissions. There are no instances of the old direct SDK context access method for event emission within thegovmodule, aligning with the review comment's emphasis on a more decoupled and testable event management system. All event emissions throughout the governance module have been updated to use this new approach.* 198-198: The propagation of message events using `k.environment.EventService.EventManager(ctx).Emit(events)` within the `EndBlocker` function after executing proposal messages is a critical update. This change ensures that events are correctly emitted in the context of the new environment-based architecture. It's crucial to verify that all event emissions in the governance module follow this pattern for consistency.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the initialization of EventService in the Keeper's environment and its usage across the governance module. rg --type go "EventService"Length of output: 3791
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any direct calls to the SDK context's event manager within the `gov` module. rg --type go "ctx.EventManager()" x/gov/Length of output: 42
Verification successful
The verification process has identified multiple instances within the governance (
gov) module whereEventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitandEventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKVare used for event emissions. This confirms the review comment's emphasis on the critical update for consistent event propagation usingEventServicewithin the governance module. Based on the evidence provided by the script output, it can be concluded that the governance module indeed follows the mentioned pattern for event emissions consistently.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify consistent usage of EventService for event emissions in the governance module. rg --type go "EventService" | grep "Emit"Length of output: 2343
x/gov/keeper/deposit.go (1)
- 179-183: The refactored event emission logic now correctly utilizes the
EventServicefrom the keeper's environment, aligning with the PR's objective to enhance modularity and maintainability by decoupling from direct SDK context access. This change is consistent with the overall goal of migrating to use environment variables and context-based configurations. However, ensure that theEventManagermethod and theEmitfunction are properly defined and implemented in theEventServiceto avoid runtime errors.x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go (4)
- 105-118: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [31-114]
The changes in the
SubmitProposalmethod, including the switch toctxfor context, adjustments in gas consumption handling, and updates in event emission, are well-aligned with the PR's objectives. However, ensure that theGetGasMeterandGetGasConfigmethods are correctly implemented in theGasServiceto accurately manage gas consumption. Additionally, verify that theEventManagermethod inEventServiceproperly handles the event emission to maintain consistency and avoid potential runtime issues.
- 157-176: The modifications in the
CancelProposalmethod, including the use ofctxfor context and updates in event emission, enhance the method's clarity and maintainability. It's crucial to ensure that theHeaderServicecorrectly retrieves header information, such asTimeandHeight, to accurately populate theCanceledTimeandCanceledHeightfields in the response. This change supports the PR's goal of improving the governance module's configuration flexibility and operational efficiency.- 279-293: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [272-290]
The changes in the
Depositmethod, particularly the switch toctxfor context and the update in event emission, are consistent with the PR's objectives to utilizecontext.Contextmore extensively. Ensure that theEventServiceand itsEventManagermethod are correctly implemented to handle event emissions properly. This adjustment contributes to the module's improved modularity and maintainability.
- 378-387: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [370-384]
The
SudoExecmethod's modifications, including the handler invocation and event emission updates, align with the PR's goals of enhancing the governance module's flexibility and maintainability. It's important to ensure that therouter.Handlermethod correctly resolves the handler for the sudo-ed message and that theEventServiceaccurately emits events to reflect the execution results. These changes contribute to a more modular and adaptable governance module.tests/integration/gov/abci_test.go (11)
- 43-43: The change from a direct call to
gov.EndBlockerto usingsuite.GovKeeper.EndBlockerin the testTestUnregisteredProposal_InactiveProposalFailscorrectly reflects the refactor towards using theGovKeeperinstance directly. This is a positive change for modularity and clarity.- 71-71: Similarly, in
TestUnregisteredProposal_ActiveProposalFails, the update to usesuite.GovKeeper.EndBlockeraligns with the refactor's goal to directly utilize theGovKeeperinstance. This change enhances the test's clarity and maintainability.- 111-111: The modification in
TestTickExpiredDepositPeriodto invokeEndBlockerthroughsuite.GovKeeperinstead of the previous approach is consistent with the refactor's objectives. It ensures that the test leverages theGovKeeperinstance, improving code consistency across the test suite.- 161-161: In
TestTickMultipleExpiredDepositPeriod, the use ofsuite.GovKeeper.EndBlockerfor the first time point is correctly implemented, adhering to the refactor's direction. This change maintains the test's integrity while aligning with the new code structure.- 166-166: The subsequent call to
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlockerwithin the same test function (TestTickMultipleExpiredDepositPeriod) further demonstrates consistency in applying the refactor across different scenarios within a single test. This ensures uniformity in how theEndBlockerlogic is invoked.- 248-248: In
TestProposalDepositRefundFailEndBlocker, the transition tosuite.GovKeeper.EndBlockeris correctly applied, showcasing an adherence to the refactor's principles. This change is crucial for maintaining the test's functionality while embracing the new architectural approach.- 316-316: The update in
TestTickPassedVotingPeriodto usesuite.GovKeeper.EndBlockeris in line with the refactor, ensuring that the test accurately reflects the new code structure. This change is essential for the test's relevance and effectiveness.- 397-397: In
TestProposalPassedEndblocker, the adoption ofsuite.GovKeeper.EndBlockeris correctly implemented, aligning with the refactor's goal to directly utilize theGovKeeperinstance. This enhances the test's clarity and maintainability.- 452-452: The change in
TestEndBlockerProposalHandlerFailedto invokeEndBlockerthroughsuite.GovKeeperinstead of the previous approach is consistent with the refactor's objectives. It ensures that the test leverages theGovKeeperinstance, improving code consistency across the test suite.- 555-555: In
TestExpeditedProposal_PassAndConversionToRegular, the use ofsuite.GovKeeper.EndBlockerfor handling the expedited proposal scenario is correctly implemented, adhering to the refactor's direction. This change maintains the test's integrity while aligning with the new code structure.- 604-604: The subsequent call to
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlockerwithin the same test function (TestExpeditedProposal_PassAndConversionToRegular) for validating the converted regular proposal is appropriately applied. This ensures uniformity in how theEndBlockerlogic is invoked across different proposal scenarios.simapp/app.go (1)
- 389-389: The modification to the
govKeeperdeclaration to includeruntime.NewEnvironment(runtime.NewKVStoreService(keys[govtypes.StoreKey]), logger)as a parameter and removeappCodecaligns with the PR's objective to utilize environment variables more extensively. This change enhances the flexibility and configurability of the governance module by leveraging a more dynamic environment-based approach. Ensure that all references and usages ofgovKeeperthroughout the codebase are updated to reflect this new signature.
x/gov/keeper/proposal.go
Outdated
| cacheCtx := k.environment.BranchService.Execute(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) error { | ||
| return nil | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The replacement of sdkCtx.CacheContext() with k.environment.BranchService.Execute(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) error { return nil }) is a significant change. It's crucial to ensure that the branching logic previously handled by CacheContext is correctly implemented by BranchService.Execute. However, the provided lambda function does nothing, which might not replicate the original caching behavior intended for transaction simulation or temporary state changes. This needs further clarification or adjustment to ensure it fulfills its intended purpose.
Consider implementing the branching logic within the lambda function to accurately replicate the behavior of CacheContext.
|
I am taking over this as Sam is off, as I want to migrate x/gov to the message router service in #19571. |
julienrbrt
changed the title
|
As I did most of the changes in this PR, I'll refrain myself from reviewing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (5)
- UPGRADING.md (1 hunks)
- core/gas/service.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
core/gas/service.go (1)
- 43-43: The addition of the
GetGasConfigmethod to theServiceinterface is a significant enhancement for dynamic gas configuration management. It's crucial to ensure that all implementations of theServiceinterface are updated to include this new method to maintain compatibility.tests/integration/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
- 109-109: The update to initialize
govKeeperusingruntime.NewEnvironmentandlog.NewNopLogger()aligns with the migration towards a more flexible configuration system. Ensure that this change is consistently applied across all tests and modules to maintain uniformity and leverage the benefits of the new environment-based configuration.x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (1)
- 159-161: The addition of the
GetGasConfigmethod to thegasServicestruct is a valuable enhancement for accessing dynamic gas configurations. It's essential to ensure that this method is properly integrated and utilized wherever gas configurations are needed, enhancing the system's flexibility and adaptability.simapp/app.go (1)
- 383-384: The modification of the
govKeeperdeclaration to includeruntime.NewEnvironment(runtime.NewKVStoreService(keys[govtypes.StoreKey]), logger)instead of the previous parameters (runtime.NewKVStoreService(keys[govtypes.StoreKey]), app.AuthKeeper, app.BankKeeper) aligns with the PR's objective to enhance configuration flexibility and operational manageability by leveraging environment variables. This change simplifies the initialization by encapsulating the environment setup within a singleEnvironmentstruct, which is a positive step towards a more modular and maintainable codebase.However, ensure that the removal of direct references to
app.AuthKeeperandapp.BankKeeperin thegovKeeperinitialization does not impact any governance module functionalities that might rely on these keepers. It's crucial to verify that all necessary functionalities are either preserved or suitably adapted within the newEnvironmentstruct to maintain the module's integrity and capabilities.UPGRADING.md (1)
- 213-217: The documentation correctly updates the Gov v1beta1 proposal handler to accept a
context.Contextinstead ofsdk.Context. This change aligns with the migration towards more standard context management and compatibility with server/v2. However, it's crucial to ensure that developers are aware of the need to unwrap the sdk context when continuing to use baseapp, as this might be a common source of confusion during the migration process.
| type GasConfig struct { | ||
| HasCost Gas | ||
| DeleteCost Gas | ||
| ReadCostFlat Gas | ||
| ReadCostPerByte Gas | ||
| WriteCostFlat Gas | ||
| WriteCostPerByte Gas | ||
| IterNextCostFlat Gas | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The GasConfig struct introduces various fields to manage gas costs dynamically. It's well-structured and covers a comprehensive range of gas-related configurations. However, consider adding documentation comments for each field to explain their purpose and usage clearly, enhancing code readability and maintainability.
+ // GasConfig holds the configuration for gas costs in the system.
type GasConfig struct {
+ // HasCost defines the gas cost for checking the existence of an item.
HasCost Gas
+ // DeleteCost defines the gas cost for deleting an item.
DeleteCost Gas
+ // ReadCostFlat defines the flat gas cost for reading an item.
ReadCostFlat Gas
+ // ReadCostPerByte defines the gas cost per byte for reading an item.
ReadCostPerByte Gas
+ // WriteCostFlat defines the flat gas cost for writing an item.
WriteCostFlat Gas
+ // WriteCostPerByte defines the gas cost per byte for writing an item.
WriteCostPerByte Gas
+ // IterNextCostFlat defines the flat gas cost for iterating to the next item.
IterNextCostFlat Gas
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| type GasConfig struct { | |
| HasCost Gas | |
| DeleteCost Gas | |
| ReadCostFlat Gas | |
| ReadCostPerByte Gas | |
| WriteCostFlat Gas | |
| WriteCostPerByte Gas | |
| IterNextCostFlat Gas | |
| } | |
| // GasConfig holds the configuration for gas costs in the system. | |
| type GasConfig struct { | |
| // HasCost defines the gas cost for checking the existence of an item. | |
| HasCost Gas | |
| // DeleteCost defines the gas cost for deleting an item. | |
| DeleteCost Gas | |
| // ReadCostFlat defines the flat gas cost for reading an item. | |
| ReadCostFlat Gas | |
| // ReadCostPerByte defines the gas cost per byte for reading an item. | |
| ReadCostPerByte Gas | |
| // WriteCostFlat defines the flat gas cost for writing an item. | |
| WriteCostFlat Gas | |
| // WriteCostPerByte defines the gas cost per byte for writing an item. | |
| WriteCostPerByte Gas | |
| // IterNextCostFlat defines the flat gas cost for iterating to the next item. | |
| IterNextCostFlat Gas | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 4
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (7)
- runtime/gas.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/abci_test.go (11 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/abci.go (11 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/abci_internal_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go (9 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- simapp/app.go
- tests/integration/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go
Additional comments: 24
x/gov/keeper/abci_internal_test.go (1)
- 19-25: The implementation of
InvokeUntypedinmockRoutercorrectly simulates the behavior of causing a panic based on thepanicfield. This is a good practice for testing error handling in functions that interact with external components. No changes are needed here.runtime/gas.go (2)
- 33-35: The
GetGasConfigmethod inGasServiceprovides a structured way to retrieve gas configurations. This is a good addition for enhancing flexibility in gas management. Ensure thatsdk.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx).KVGasConfig()is properly implemented and tested to avoid runtime errors.- 106-136: The
GasConfigstruct and its methods provide a clear and accessible way to interact with gas cost parameters. This is a significant improvement for code readability and maintainability. However, ensure that the underlyinggas.GasConfigstruct fields are correctly initialized and that there's comprehensive test coverage for these methods to prevent unexpected behavior.x/gov/keeper/abci.go (2)
- 23-23: The updated function signature of
EndBlockerto acceptcontext.Contextand return anerroraligns with Go's standard context management and error handling practices. This change enhances the function's flexibility and error reporting capabilities.- 273-281: The
safeExecuteHandlerfunction provides a robust way to execute messages while safely handling panics. This is a critical addition for ensuring the stability of the governance module. The use ofdeferfor panic recovery is a good practice. Ensure comprehensive testing of this function to cover various panic scenarios.x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go (8)
- 8-10: The addition of new imports, including
google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoifaceand variouscosmossdk.iopackages, aligns with the PR's objectives to refactor the governance module to utilize environment variables and context-based configurations more extensively. Ensure that these new dependencies are properly managed and versioned to avoid potential conflicts or issues.- 34-34: The method signature for
SubmitProposalhas been updated to usecontext.Contextinstead of the previoussdk.Context. This change is consistent with the PR's goal of migrating towards a more standard and flexible context management approach. It's crucial to verify that all invocations of this method throughout the codebase have been updated accordingly to prevent runtime errors.- 100-101: The gas consumption logic has been adjusted to use the new
GasServiceandGasConfigstructs, which is a positive change towards a more structured and dynamic approach to handling gas configurations. However, ensure that the gas consumption values are appropriately calibrated to prevent over or underestimation of gas costs, which could impact transaction processing efficiency.- 111-116: The event emission logic has been modified to utilize the environment's event service instead of direct SDK context access. This decouples the event management from the SDK context, making it more testable and maintainable. Ensure that all events are correctly emitted and captured by the system's event listeners to maintain functionality.
- 164-164: The
CancelProposalmethod's signature has been updated similarly toSubmitProposal, reflecting the migration tocontext.Context. This consistency in context usage across methods is commendable. Again, ensure that all calls to this method are updated to use the new context type.Verification successful
Given the script did not produce any output, it suggests that there are no invocations of
CancelProposalusing an outdated context type. This aligns with the expectation that the method's signature has been updated to usecontext.Contextand that all calls to this method have been correctly updated across the codebase. Therefore, the review comment appears to be consistent with the codebase as verified.* 190-190: The introduction of the `ExecLegacyContent` method is part of the efforts to maintain backward compatibility while transitioning to the new architecture. It's important to ensure that the legacy content is correctly handled and that the respective handlers are properly invoked to maintain the integrity of the governance process. * 280-280: The `Deposit` method has been updated to reflect the new context management approach and the refined logic for handling deposits. This change is in line with the PR's objectives to streamline the governance module's code structure and logic. Ensure that the deposit validation logic (`validateDeposit`) is robust and correctly prevents invalid or negative deposit amounts. * 376-387: The `SudoExec` method introduces a branching logic using the `BranchService`. This is a significant change that requires careful testing to ensure that the branching logic is correctly implemented and that the sudo-ed messages are executed as expected without unintended side effects.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for invocations of CancelProposal with the old context type. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'CancelProposal($_, $_)'Length of output: 55
tests/integration/gov/abci_test.go (11)
- 43-43: The call to
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)is correctly used to simulate the end of a block and process any pending governance actions. However, it's important to ensure that the context (ctx) passed toEndBlockeris correctly prepared for the test scenario, including setting the appropriate block time and height.- 71-71: Similar to the previous comment, the use of
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)here is appropriate for testing the governance module's logic at the end of a block. Ensure that the test context is accurately set up to reflect the scenario being tested, especially regarding the block time and any other relevant state.- 111-111: The use of
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)in this test case is correct for simulating the governance logic at block end. It's crucial to verify that the test setup, including the context and any mock data, accurately represents the test conditions to ensure meaningful test results.- 161-161: The call to
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)is used appropriately to test the governance module's end-of-block logic. As with other tests, ensure that the context and test setup accurately reflect the intended test scenario, including the timing of proposal submission and deposit periods.- 166-166: This additional call to
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)within the same test function is used to simulate another block end. It's important to ensure that the context (ctx) is correctly updated between calls toEndBlockerto reflect the passage of time or any other changes relevant to the test scenario.- 248-248: The call to
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)here is used to simulate the end of the voting period and process the proposal. The test checks for the correct handling of deposit refunds or burns in case of errors. It's crucial to ensure that the test setup accurately simulates the conditions under which the deposit refund or burn would fail, including the state of the governance module account.- 316-316: The use of
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)in this test case is appropriate for simulating the governance logic at the end of the voting period. Ensure that the test context is set up correctly, especially regarding the proposal type and the timing of the voting period, to accurately test the intended behavior.- 397-397: This call to
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)is used to simulate the governance logic at the end of the voting period for a proposal. It's important to ensure that the test setup, including the context and any mock data, accurately represents the conditions under which the proposal is expected to pass or fail.- 452-452: The call to
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)here is used to simulate the governance logic at the end of the voting period, specifically testing the handling of proposals that fail execution. Ensure that the test setup accurately represents the conditions under which a proposal would fail execution, including the state of the governance module account and any relevant message handlers.- 555-555: The use of
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)in this test case is correct for simulating the governance logic at the end of the expedited voting period. It's crucial to ensure that the test setup, including the context and any mock data, accurately represents the conditions under which an expedited proposal is expected to pass or fail and be converted to a regular proposal.- 604-604: This call to
suite.GovKeeper.EndBlocker(ctx)is used to simulate the governance logic at the end of the voting period for a converted regular proposal. Ensure that the test setup, including the context and any mock data, accurately represents the conditions under which the converted regular proposal is expected to pass or fail.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 4
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (2)
- UPGRADING.md (2 hunks)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- simapp/app.go
Additional comments: 66
UPGRADING.md (66)
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [4-4]
The term "SimApp" is correctly used in the context of Cosmos SDK and does not require correction.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [18-18]
The diff block correctly demonstrates how to update the
client.Contextwith new codecs. The instructions are clear and concise.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [27-27]
The term "depinject" is specific to the Cosmos SDK's dependency injection mechanism and is used correctly here.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [38-38]
The term "depinject" is specific to the Cosmos SDK's dependency injection mechanism and is used correctly here.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [42-42]
The diff block correctly demonstrates how to refactor the module manager registration in
app.go. The instructions are clear and concise.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [52-52]
The term "AnteHandlers" is specific to the Cosmos SDK and refers to a set of decorators used in transaction processing. The term is used correctly here.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [60-60]
The term "nonces" is used correctly in the context of blockchain transactions, referring to numbers used once to ensure transactions are processed in order.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [132-132]
The term "Protobuf" is correctly used here to refer to Protocol Buffers, a method of serializing structured data.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [134-134]
The term "CometBFT" is correctly used in the context of the Cosmos SDK, referring to the consensus engine.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [145-145]
The term "baseapp" is specific to the Cosmos SDK and is used correctly here to refer to the basic application framework.
- 151-151: The code snippet correctly demonstrates how to instantiate a new keeper with the environment passed in. The example is clear and relevant.
- 166-166: The term "depinject" is specific to the Cosmos SDK's dependency injection mechanism and is used correctly here.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [170-170]
The term "Params" is correctly used here to refer to module parameters within the Cosmos SDK.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [176-176]
The code snippet correctly demonstrates how to update the genesis interface to use
context.Contextinstead ofsdk.Context. This change aligns with the migration towards standard Go contexts for better flexibility and interoperability.
- 224-224: The term "baseapp" is specific to the Cosmos SDK and is used correctly here to refer to the basic application framework.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [273-273]
The term "CometBFT" is correctly used in the context of the Cosmos SDK, referring to the consensus engine.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [313-313]
The term "BaseApp" is specific to the Cosmos SDK and is used correctly here to refer to the basic application framework.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [322-322]
The terms "BeginBlock" and "Endblock" are specific to the Cosmos SDK's lifecycle of a block. The usage here is correct, indicating changes in their accessibility.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [327-327]
The sequence of operations described here is accurate and relevant for understanding the execution order within the Cosmos SDK's block processing.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [329-329]
The introduction of
ExtendVoteandVerifyVoteExtensionmethods is correctly described, highlighting their role in extending and verifying pre-commit votes within the Cosmos SDK.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [337-337]
The explanation of the
SetPreBlockermethod and its significance in runningPreBlockbefore other modules is clear and accurate.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [374-374]
The description of how events are now emitted through
FinalizeBlockinstead of directly populating the log section ofabci.TxResultis accurate and reflects changes in the Cosmos SDK.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [384-384]
The term "Confix" is introduced as a new SDK tool for configuration management. While the name might seem like a typo, it is used correctly in the context of the Cosmos SDK.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [399-399]
The term "gRPC-Web" is correctly capitalized and used in the context of the Cosmos SDK to refer to the gRPC Web protocol.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [405-405]
The databases mentioned (ClevelDB, BoltDB, and BadgerDB) are correctly identified as no longer supported, aligning with the Cosmos SDK's move towards more efficient database solutions.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [408-408]
The term "Protobuf" is correctly used here to refer to Protocol Buffers, a method of serializing structured data.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [416-416]
The summary of proto annotation requirements is accurate and provides necessary guidance for module developers to ensure compatibility with both Amino JSON and Protobuf codecs.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [418-418]
The removal of the
gogoproto.goproto_stringer = falseannotation from most proto files is correctly described, indicating a change in how theString()method is generated for types.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [421-421]
The term "SimApp" is correctly used in the context of Cosmos SDK and does not require correction.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [428-428]
The explanation of module assertions and wiring changes is accurate and reflects the Cosmos SDK's evolution towards more modular and flexible app design.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [432-432]
The update to the
NewKeeperfunction across various modules to take aKVStoreServiceinstead of aStoreKeyis correctly described, highlighting an important architectural change.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [450-450]
The code snippet correctly demonstrates how to update the
ConsensusParamsKeeperinstantiation inapp.go. This change aligns with the Cosmos SDK's migration towards more explicit and modular keeper management.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [463-463]
The term "CometBFT" is correctly used in the context of the Cosmos SDK, referring to the consensus engine.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [465-465]
The explanation of the changes required for
depinject/ app v2 users regarding logger supply is clear and accurately reflects the Cosmos SDK's dependency injection mechanism.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [486-486]
The term "ModuleBasics" is specific to the Cosmos SDK and is used correctly here to refer to the basic module manager.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [505-505]
The code snippet correctly demonstrates how to use the
module.NewBasicManagerFromManagerfunction for manual module wiring inapp.go. This change aligns with the Cosmos SDK's move towards more explicit module management.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [509-509]
The introduction of
AutoCLIand its automatic addition of custom module commands to the root command is correctly described, highlighting an important usability improvement in the Cosmos SDK.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [554-554]
The explanation of the
storemodule extraction to a standalone module and the renaming of imports is accurate and reflects the Cosmos SDK's modularization efforts.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [561-561]
The update to state streaming service registration in
app.gois correctly described, providing clear instructions for developers to adapt to the new method.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [571-571]
The changes to the
TxConfiginterface and the introduction of a new sign mode producing more human-readable output are accurately described, highlighting improvements in transaction handling within the Cosmos SDK.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [597-597]
The explanation of the
x/authzmodule's updates, including changes toNewMsgGrantandNewGrant, is clear and accurately reflects the Cosmos SDK's enhancements in authorization management.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [610-610]
The description of the keyring refactor, including changes to interfaces and serialization, is accurate and provides necessary guidance for developers to adapt to the new keyring structure.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [627-627]
The introduction of a
postHandleras a counterpart to theanteHandlerfor post-message execution logic is correctly described, highlighting an important addition to the Cosmos SDK's transaction processing flow.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [639-639]
The explanation of the IAVL "fast" index introduction and its impact on query performance is accurate and provides important information for node operators regarding the upgrade process.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [666-666]
The summary of changes in the
x/paramsmodule and the migration towards module-specific parameter management is accurate and reflects the Cosmos SDK's architectural evolution.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [674-674]
The description of improvements in the
x/govmodule, including support for expedited proposals and proposal cancellation, is clear and accurately reflects the Cosmos SDK's governance enhancements.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [688-688]
The explanation of the
x/consensusmodule introduction and the migration process for Tendermint consensus parameters is accurate and provides necessary guidance for developers to adapt to the new module.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [698-698]
The description of the
x/nftmodule's changes regardingclassIDandnftIDvalidation is accurate and highlights an important flexibility improvement for NFT developers within the Cosmos SDK.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [706-706]
The explanation of Ledger support generalization and the introduction of new key types is accurate and provides important information for developers integrating hardware wallets with the Cosmos SDK.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [716-716]
The summary of API changes, including package renamings and method updates, is accurate and provides a clear overview of the Cosmos SDK's evolution towards a more modular and flexible architecture.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [726-726]
The introduction of new packages for error handling, math types, and standalone modules is accurately described, highlighting the Cosmos SDK's ongoing efforts towards better modularity and clarity in its codebase.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [738-738]
The explanation of the
x/evidencemodule extraction to a standalone module and the renaming of imports is accurate and reflects the Cosmos SDK's modularization efforts.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [746-746]
The description of the Rosetta tool's move to its own repository and the implications for node operators and developers is accurate and provides important information regarding the Cosmos SDK's tooling ecosystem.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [754-754]
The summary of the migration to CometBFT as the default consensus engine and the necessary steps for chains to adapt is accurate and provides necessary guidance for developers to ensure compatibility with the new consensus engine.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [762-762]
The explanation of simulation changes, including the removal of
RandomizedParamsfrom theAppModuleSimulationinterface, is clear and accurately reflects the Cosmos SDK's enhancements in simulation testing.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [770-770]
The introduction of new gRPC services and the necessary steps for app developers to register these services in their application construction is accurately described, highlighting improvements in the Cosmos SDK's gRPC interface.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [778-778]
The summary of changes in the
AppModuleinterface, including the removal of legacy methods and the migration to extension interfaces, is accurate and provides a clear overview of the Cosmos SDK's evolution towards a more modular app design.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [786-786]
The explanation of the
simapppackage's intended usage and the introduction of theruntime.AppIinterface for application testing is accurate and provides important guidance for developers to leverage the Cosmos SDK's testing utilities effectively.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [794-794]
The description of the
storemodule extraction to a standalone module and the renaming of imports is accurate and reflects the Cosmos SDK's modularization efforts.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [802-802]
The update to state streaming service registration in
app.gois correctly described, providing clear instructions for developers to adapt to the new method.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [812-812]
The changes to the
TxConfiginterface and the introduction of a new sign mode producing more human-readable output are accurately described, highlighting improvements in transaction handling within the Cosmos SDK.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [828-828]
The explanation of the
x/authzmodule's updates, including changes toNewMsgGrantandNewGrant, is clear and accurately reflects the Cosmos SDK's enhancements in authorization management.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [841-841]
The description of the keyring refactor, including changes to interfaces and serialization, is accurate and provides necessary guidance for developers to adapt to the new keyring structure.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [858-858]
The introduction of a
postHandleras a counterpart to theanteHandlerfor post-message execution logic is correctly described, highlighting an important addition to the Cosmos SDK's transaction processing flow.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [870-870]
The explanation of the IAVL "fast" index introduction and its impact on query performance is accurate and provides important information for node operators regarding the upgrade process.
- 148-167: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [899-899]
The summary of changes in the
x/paramsmodule and the migration towards module-specific parameter management is accurate and reflects the Cosmos SDK's architectural evolution.
julienrbrt
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (5)
- UPGRADING.md (2 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/common_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go (9 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/proposal.go (8 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go
Additional comments: 10
x/gov/keeper/common_test.go (2)
- 115-115: The introduction of the
environmentvariable usingruntime.NewEnvironmentis a significant change. It's crucial to ensure that all dependencies and services required by thegovKeeperare correctly initialized and passed through thisenvironment. This change aligns with the goal of enhancing configuration flexibility and operational manageability.- 135-135: The modification to initialize
govKeeperwith theenvironmentparameter instead ofstoreServiceandbaseApp.MsgServiceRouter()directly is a good practice. It encapsulates the dependencies within theenvironment, making the code cleaner and more modular. However, ensure that all functionalities previously provided bystoreServiceandbaseApp.MsgServiceRouter()are adequately handled by theenvironment.x/gov/keeper/proposal.go (7)
- 13-13: Adding the
"cosmossdk.io/core/event"import is necessary for the updated event emission logic. This change supports the migration towards a more modular and context-based architecture by utilizing theeventpackage for event management.- 86-87: Replacing
k.router.Handler(msg)withk.environment.RouterService.MessageRouterService().CanInvoke(ctx, msg)is a significant change. It aligns with the goal of decoupling and modularizing the message routing logic. Ensure that theCanInvokemethod correctly implements the logic previously handled byHandlerto maintain the integrity of message processing.- 100-107: The introduction of
v1.LegacyContentFromMessage(msg)and the use ofk.legacyRouterfor handling legacy content is a thoughtful approach to maintain backward compatibility while transitioning to the new architecture. It's important to verify that all legacy content types are correctly handled and that the transition does not introduce any regressions.- 127-127: The use of
k.environment.HeaderService.GetHeaderInfo(ctx).Timeto obtain the current time for setting the proposal submission time is a good practice. It ensures that the time is consistently sourced from the same context-based service across the application, enhancing maintainability and testability.- 147-150: Updating the event emission logic from
sdkCtx.EventManager()tok.environment.EventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKV()is a positive change. It decouples the event management from the SDK context, aligning with the overall goal of migrating towards a more modular and context-based architecture. Ensure that all events are correctly emitted and handled in the new system.- 189-189: The replacement of direct time access with
k.environment.HeaderService.GetHeaderInfo(ctx).Timefor determining the current time during proposal cancellation is consistent with the changes made elsewhere in the code. This consistency is crucial for maintainability and ensures that the time source remains uniform across the application.- 220-220: Replacing
sdkCtx.Logger()withk.Logger().Info()for logging within theCancelProposalfunction is in line with the migration towards using the environment's logging service. This change enhances the modularity and flexibility of the logging mechanism. Ensure that the logging level and format are appropriately maintained.x/gov/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)
- 2134-2134: The change in the expected error message from "unrecognized message route" to "unknown message" in the
TestMsgSudoExecfunction likely reflects updates in the error handling or message routing logic within the governance module or the message router service. Ensure this change aligns with the updated logic and intended behavior.
julienrbrt
force-pushed
the
sam/env-bundle-gov
branch
from
558bf73
to
537708f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 7
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (25)
- UPGRADING.md (2 hunks)
- core/gas/service.go (2 hunks)
- runtime/gas.go (2 hunks)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/abci_test.go (11 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- x/gov/depinject.go (4 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/abci.go (11 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/abci_internal_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/common_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/deposit.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/hooks_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/keeper.go (5 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/migrations.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go (9 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/proposal.go (8 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/vote.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/module.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/types/v1beta1/content.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/types/v1beta1/proposal.go (2 hunks)
- x/params/proposal_handler.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (21)
- core/gas/service.go
- runtime/gas.go
- simapp/app.go
- tests/integration/gov/abci_test.go
- tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go
- tests/integration/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go
- x/gov/depinject.go
- x/gov/keeper/abci_internal_test.go
- x/gov/keeper/common_test.go
- x/gov/keeper/deposit.go
- x/gov/keeper/hooks_test.go
- x/gov/keeper/migrations.go
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server.go
- x/gov/keeper/msg_server_test.go
- x/gov/keeper/proposal.go
- x/gov/keeper/vote.go
- x/gov/module.go
- x/gov/types/v1beta1/content.go
- x/gov/types/v1beta1/proposal.go
- x/params/proposal_handler.go
Additional comments: 15
x/gov/CHANGELOG.md (1)
- 60-67: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [63-73]
The changelog entries under "API Breaking Changes" and "Deprecated" sections provide a clear summary of the significant changes introduced in this PR. However, it's essential to ensure that all changes are accurately reflected and that the links to PRs/issues are correct and functional. Additionally, consider adding more context or examples for complex changes to aid understanding.
- Ensure all PR and issue links are valid.
- For complex changes, consider adding a brief explanation or example directly in the changelog or linking to documentation that does.
x/gov/keeper/keeper.go (4)
- 34-36: The addition of the
environmentfield to theKeeperstruct is a significant change that aligns with the PR's objective to migrate module configuration to use environment variables. This change enhances the flexibility and manageability of the governance module by leveraging theappmodule.Environmentstruct for configuration.
- Ensure that the
environmentfield is properly initialized and used throughout the module to access environment-specific settings and services.
- 85-87: The update to the
NewKeeperfunction signature to acceptappmodule.Environmentas a parameter is a critical change that supports the migration to environment variable-based configuration. This change simplifies the module's configuration management and aligns with best practices for modern application development.
- Verify that all calls to
NewKeeperthroughout the Cosmos SDK codebase have been updated to pass theappmodule.Environmentparameter.- Ensure that the
environmentparameter is used effectively within theKeeperto access and manage module-specific settings and services.
- 112-114: The initialization of the
Keeperstruct with theenvironmentparameter is correctly implemented. This change is part of the broader effort to migrate the module to use environment variables for configuration, enhancing the module's flexibility and manageability.
- Confirm that the
environmentfield is utilized appropriately within theKeepermethods to access environment-specific settings and services.
- 172-173: The modification to the
Loggermethod to access the logger from theenvironmentfield instead of the context directly is a good practice. It centralizes the logging configuration and makes it easier to manage across the module.
- Ensure that the logger obtained from the
environmentis used consistently for logging within thex/govmodule.x/gov/keeper/abci.go (7)
- 23-23: The function signature of
EndBlockerhas been updated to usecontext.Contextinstead ofsdk.Context. This aligns with modern Go practices and improves compatibility with other Go libraries and frameworks. However, ensure that all callers of this function are updated to pass the correct context type.- 29-30: The use of
collections.NewPrefixUntilPairRangewithk.environment.HeaderService.GetHeaderInfo(ctx).Timeas a parameter is a good approach to query proposals based on time. However, ensure that theHeaderServiceand its methodGetHeaderInfoare thoroughly tested, especially for edge cases around time zones and leap seconds.- 56-63: The conditional logic for refunding or burning deposits based on
params.BurnProposalDepositPrevoteis clear and concise. However, ensure that theRefundAndDeleteDepositsandDeleteAndBurnDepositsmethods are well-documented and tested, particularly for their side effects on the proposal's state and the overall system's state.Verification successful
The verification process has identified that both
RefundAndDeleteDepositsandDeleteAndBurnDepositsmethods are indeed referenced in thedeposit_test.gotest file, indicating that tests have been written to cover these methods. This satisfies the initial request to ensure that these methods are well-documented and tested, particularly for their side effects on the proposal's state and the overall system's state. However, the quality and coverage of these tests were not assessed, and it is recommended to review the tests indeposit_test.gofor comprehensiveness.* 211-218: The logic for converting expedited or optimistic proposals to standard proposals upon failure is clear and follows the specified rules. Ensure that the implications of changing the proposal type and extending the voting period are well-documented and tested, especially regarding how they affect the proposal's lifecycle and governance processes.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the RefundAndDeleteDeposits and DeleteAndBurnDeposits methods # This is a placeholder for actual test commands or scripts echo "Ensure comprehensive tests for RefundAndDeleteDeposits and DeleteAndBurnDeposits"Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the method definitions of RefundAndDeleteDeposits and DeleteAndBurnDeposits rg "func (.*RefundAndDeleteDeposits|.*DeleteAndBurnDeposits)" -C 5 # Attempt to locate test files for these methods fd "RefundAndDeleteDeposits|DeleteAndBurnDeposits" --glob "*_test.go"Length of output: 1808
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correctly search for test files related to RefundAndDeleteDeposits and DeleteAndBurnDeposits fd "test.go$" | xargs rg "RefundAndDeleteDeposits|DeleteAndBurnDeposits"Length of output: 250
Verification successful
The executed scripts aimed to verify the conversion of expedited/optimistic proposals to standard proposals and to check for tests covering this conversion and its implications on the proposal lifecycle. The scripts searched the codebase for mentions of expedited and optimistic proposals and their conversion to standard proposals. The output provided several references to documentation, code comments, and test cases that describe the behavior and implementation of expedited and optimistic proposals, including their conversion to standard proposals under certain conditions.
The references found in the
UPGRADING.md,README.md,CHANGELOG.md, and various.gofiles confirm the implementation of expedited and optimistic proposals, their parameters, and the conditions under which they are converted to standard proposals. Additionally, the presence of test cases specifically mentioning expedited proposals and their conversion to standard proposals indicates that there is test coverage for this functionality.Based on the information gathered from the script outputs, it can be concluded that the codebase does implement the logic for converting expedited/optimistic proposals to standard proposals upon failure, and there are tests covering this conversion and its implications on the proposal lifecycle.
* 239-239: Updating the proposal's status and other attributes after tallying votes is crucial. Ensure that the `Proposals.Set` method is robust, especially in handling concurrent updates to the same proposal, to prevent data races or inconsistencies. * 273-281: The `safeExecuteHandler` function is a good practice for preventing panics from affecting the chain's stability. Ensure that this function is thoroughly tested with various message types and scenarios that could potentially cause panics. * 295-305: > 📝 **NOTE** > This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [288-316]Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the conversion of expedited/optimistic proposals to standard proposals # This is a placeholder for actual test commands or scripts echo "Ensure tests cover conversion and implications on proposal lifecycle"Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of the conversion logic in the codebase rg "expedited|optimistic.*standard.*proposal" --context 5 # Search for tests related to the conversion of expedited/optimistic proposals to standard proposals rg "test.*expedited|test.*optimistic.*standard.*proposal" --context 5Length of output: 133273
The
failUnsupportedProposalfunction encapsulates the logic for handling proposals that cannot be processed. This is a good example of code organization. Ensure that the implications of failing a proposal in this manner are well-understood and documented, especially regarding how it affects the proposal's lifecycle and governance processes.UPGRADING.md (3)
- 151-151: The example provided for
x/circuitseems to be using a placeholder module name. Ensure that this is intentional and correctly represents a generic example, or update it with a real module name if necessary.- 157-157: The diff code snippet for updating the
govKeeperinstantiation correctly demonstrates the migration to using theruntime.NewEnvironmentfunction. This change aligns with the broader SDK updates for environment handling and should improve modularity and testability.- 221-225: The update to the Gov v1beta1 proposal handler to accept a
context.Contextinstead ofsdk.Contextis a significant change that aligns with the migration to server/v2. This change enhances compatibility and flexibility for proposal handlers. Ensure that all custom proposal handlers are updated accordingly to avoid runtime issues.
| package keeper | ||
|
|
||
| import ( | ||
| "context" | ||
| "errors" | ||
| "fmt" | ||
| "time" | ||
|
|
||
| "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoiface" | ||
|
|
||
| "cosmossdk.io/collections" | ||
| "cosmossdk.io/core/event" | ||
| "cosmossdk.io/core/router" | ||
| "cosmossdk.io/log" | ||
| "cosmossdk.io/x/gov/keeper" | ||
| "cosmossdk.io/x/gov/types" | ||
| v1 "cosmossdk.io/x/gov/types/v1" | ||
|
|
||
| "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/baseapp" | ||
| "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/telemetry" | ||
| sdk "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| // EndBlocker is called every block. | ||
| func EndBlocker(ctx sdk.Context, keeper *keeper.Keeper) error { | ||
| func (k Keeper) EndBlocker(ctx context.Context) error { | ||
| defer telemetry.ModuleMeasureSince(types.ModuleName, time.Now(), telemetry.MetricKeyEndBlocker) | ||
|
|
||
| logger := keeper.Logger(ctx) | ||
| logger := k.Logger() | ||
| // delete dead proposals from store and returns theirs deposits. | ||
| // A proposal is dead when it's inactive and didn't get enough deposit on time to get into voting phase. | ||
| rng := collections.NewPrefixUntilPairRange[time.Time, uint64](ctx.HeaderInfo().Time) | ||
| err := keeper.InactiveProposalsQueue.Walk(ctx, rng, func(key collections.Pair[time.Time, uint64], _ uint64) (bool, error) { | ||
| proposal, err := keeper.Proposals.Get(ctx, key.K2()) | ||
| rng := collections.NewPrefixUntilPairRange[time.Time, uint64](k.environment.HeaderService.GetHeaderInfo(ctx).Time) | ||
| err := k.InactiveProposalsQueue.Walk(ctx, rng, func(key collections.Pair[time.Time, uint64], _ uint64) (bool, error) { | ||
| proposal, err := k.Proposals.Get(ctx, key.K2()) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| // if the proposal has an encoding error, this means it cannot be processed by x/gov | ||
| // this could be due to some types missing their registration | ||
| // instead of returning an error (i.e, halting the chain), we fail the proposal | ||
| if errors.Is(err, collections.ErrEncoding) { | ||
| proposal.Id = key.K2() | ||
| if err := failUnsupportedProposal(logger, ctx, keeper, proposal, err.Error(), false); err != nil { | ||
| if err := failUnsupportedProposal(logger, ctx, k, proposal, err.Error(), false); err != nil { | ||
| return false, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if err = keeper.DeleteProposal(ctx, proposal.Id); err != nil { | ||
| if err = k.DeleteProposal(ctx, proposal.Id); err != nil { | ||
| return false, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [31-52]
The error handling logic within the InactiveProposalsQueue.Walk method call is comprehensive, especially the handling of collections.ErrEncoding errors. However, consider abstracting some of this logic into separate functions for clarity and maintainability. For instance, handling encoding errors and deleting proposals could be encapsulated in a function like handleEncodingError.
// Proposed refactor for handling encoding errors
func (k Keeper) handleEncodingError(ctx context.Context, proposalId uint64, err error) error {
// Existing logic for handling encoding errors
}| if err := k.environment.BranchService.Execute(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) error { | ||
| return k.Hooks().AfterProposalFailedMinDeposit(ctx, proposal.Id) | ||
| }); err != nil { | ||
| // purposely ignoring the error here not to halt the chain if the hook fails |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ignoring errors from hooks, such as AfterProposalFailedMinDeposit, might be necessary to prevent halting the chain, but it could lead to unnoticed issues. Consider logging more context or implementing a monitoring/alerting mechanism for these ignored errors to ensure they can be investigated if they occur frequently.
// Suggestion to enhance error logging for ignored hook errors
logger.Error("failed to execute AfterProposalFailedMinDeposit hook", "error", err, "proposal_id", proposal.Id)| if err := k.environment.EventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKV(types.EventTypeInactiveProposal, | ||
| event.NewAttribute(types.AttributeKeyProposalID, fmt.Sprintf("%d", proposal.Id)), | ||
| event.NewAttribute(types.AttributeKeyProposalResult, types.AttributeValueProposalDropped), | ||
| ); err != nil { | ||
| logger.Error("failed to emit event", "error", err) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Emitting events for inactive proposals is crucial for transparency and auditability. However, ensure that the event attributes are comprehensive and accurately reflect the proposal's state. Additionally, consider adding more detailed error handling for event emission failures, possibly retrying or logging to an external system for further investigation.
// Suggestion to enhance error handling for event emission failures
if err := k.environment.EventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKV(...); err != nil {
// Enhanced error handling logic here
}| proposal, err := k.Proposals.Get(ctx, key.K2()) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| // if the proposal has an encoding error, this means it cannot be processed by x/gov | ||
| // this could be due to some types missing their registration | ||
| // instead of returning an error (i.e, halting the chain), we fail the proposal | ||
| if errors.Is(err, collections.ErrEncoding) { | ||
| proposal.Id = key.K2() | ||
| if err := failUnsupportedProposal(logger, ctx, keeper, proposal, err.Error(), true); err != nil { | ||
| if err := failUnsupportedProposal(logger, ctx, k, proposal, err.Error(), true); err != nil { | ||
| return false, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if err = keeper.ActiveProposalsQueue.Remove(ctx, collections.Join(*proposal.VotingEndTime, proposal.Id)); err != nil { | ||
| if err = k.ActiveProposalsQueue.Remove(ctx, collections.Join(*proposal.VotingEndTime, proposal.Id)); err != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the handling of inactive proposals, the logic for active proposals also handles encoding errors well. Again, consider abstracting repetitive logic into helper functions for better code reuse and readability.
// Proposed refactor for handling active proposal encoding errors
func (k Keeper) handleActiveProposalEncodingError(ctx context.Context, proposalId uint64, err error) error {
// Existing logic for handling encoding errors for active proposals
}| // If a proposal fails, and isn't spammy, deposits are refunded, unless the proposal is expedited or optimistic. | ||
| // An expedited or optimistic proposal that fails and isn't spammy is converted to a regular proposal. | ||
| if burnDeposits { | ||
| err = keeper.DeleteAndBurnDeposits(ctx, proposal.Id) | ||
| err = k.DeleteAndBurnDeposits(ctx, proposal.Id) | ||
| } else if passes || !(proposal.ProposalType == v1.ProposalType_PROPOSAL_TYPE_EXPEDITED || proposal.ProposalType == v1.ProposalType_PROPOSAL_TYPE_OPTIMISTIC) { | ||
| err = keeper.RefundAndDeleteDeposits(ctx, proposal.Id) | ||
| err = k.RefundAndDeleteDeposits(ctx, proposal.Id) | ||
| } | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| // in case of an error, log it and emit an event | ||
| // we do not want to halt the chain if the refund/burn fails | ||
| // as it could happen due to a governance mistake (governance has let a proposal pass that sends gov funds that were from proposal deposits) | ||
|
|
||
| keeper.Logger(ctx).Error("failed to refund or burn deposits", "error", err) | ||
| ctx.EventManager().EmitEvent( | ||
| sdk.NewEvent( | ||
| types.EventTypeProposalDeposit, | ||
| sdk.NewAttribute(types.AttributeKeyProposalID, fmt.Sprintf("%d", proposal.Id)), | ||
| sdk.NewAttribute(types.AttributeKeyProposalDepositError, "failed to refund or burn deposits"), | ||
| sdk.NewAttribute("error", err.Error()), | ||
| ), | ||
| ) | ||
| k.Logger().Error("failed to refund or burn deposits", "error", err) | ||
|
|
||
| if err := k.environment.EventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKV(types.EventTypeProposalDeposit, | ||
| event.NewAttribute(types.AttributeKeyProposalID, fmt.Sprintf("%d", proposal.Id)), | ||
| event.NewAttribute(types.AttributeKeyProposalDepositError, "failed to refund or burn deposits"), | ||
| event.NewAttribute("error", err.Error()), | ||
| ); err != nil { | ||
| k.Logger().Error("failed to emit event", "error", err) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if err = keeper.ActiveProposalsQueue.Remove(ctx, collections.Join(*proposal.VotingEndTime, proposal.Id)); err != nil { | ||
| if err = k.ActiveProposalsQueue.Remove(ctx, collections.Join(*proposal.VotingEndTime, proposal.Id)); err != nil { | ||
| return false, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| switch { | ||
| case passes: | ||
| var ( | ||
| idx int | ||
| events sdk.Events | ||
| msg sdk.Msg | ||
| idx int | ||
| msg sdk.Msg | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| // attempt to execute all messages within the passed proposal | ||
| // Messages may mutate state thus we use a cached context. If one of | ||
| // the handlers fails, no state mutation is written and the error | ||
| // message is logged. | ||
| cacheCtx, writeCache := ctx.CacheContext() | ||
| messages, err := proposal.GetMsgs() | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| proposal.Status = v1.StatusFailed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [127-147]
The logic for determining whether to burn or refund deposits based on the proposal's outcome is well-implemented. However, this block of code is complex and could benefit from being broken down into smaller, more manageable functions. This would improve readability and make the code easier to test.
// Suggested refactor for handling deposit outcomes
func (k Keeper) handleDepositOutcome(ctx context.Context, proposal v1.Proposal, passes bool, burnDeposits bool) error {
// Logic for handling deposit outcomes
}| // attempt to execute all messages within the passed proposal | ||
| // Messages may mutate state thus we use a cached context. If one of | ||
| // the handlers fails, no state mutation is written and the error | ||
| // message is logged. | ||
| if err := k.environment.BranchService.Execute(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) error { | ||
| // execute all messages | ||
| for idx, msg = range messages { | ||
| if _, err := safeExecuteHandler(ctx, msg, k.environment.RouterService.MessageRouterService()); err != nil { | ||
| // `idx` and `err` are populated with the msg index and error. | ||
| proposal.Status = v1.StatusFailed | ||
| proposal.FailedReason = err.Error() | ||
| tagValue = types.AttributeValueProposalFailed | ||
| logMsg = fmt.Sprintf("passed, but msg %d (%s) failed on execution: %s", idx, sdk.MsgTypeURL(msg), err) | ||
|
|
||
| return err | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| events = append(events, res.GetEvents()...) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // `err == nil` when all handlers passed. | ||
| // Or else, `idx` and `err` are populated with the msg index and error. | ||
| if err == nil { | ||
| proposal.Status = v1.StatusPassed | ||
| tagValue = types.AttributeValueProposalPassed | ||
| logMsg = "passed" | ||
|
|
||
| // write state to the underlying multi-store | ||
| writeCache() | ||
|
|
||
| // propagate the msg events to the current context | ||
| ctx.EventManager().EmitEvents(events) | ||
| } else { | ||
| proposal.Status = v1.StatusFailed | ||
| proposal.FailedReason = err.Error() | ||
| tagValue = types.AttributeValueProposalFailed | ||
| logMsg = fmt.Sprintf("passed, but msg %d (%s) failed on execution: %s", idx, sdk.MsgTypeURL(msg), err) | ||
| return nil | ||
| }); err != nil { | ||
| break // We do not anything with the error. Returning an error halts the chain, and proposal struct is already updated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The execution of messages within a passed proposal is a critical operation. The use of a cached context to prevent state mutations in case of an error is a good practice. However, this complex logic should be encapsulated in a separate function or method to improve readability and maintainability.
// Suggested refactor for executing proposal messages
func (k Keeper) executeProposalMessages(ctx context.Context, proposal v1.Proposal) error {
// Logic for executing proposal messages
}| if err := k.environment.EventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKV(types.EventTypeActiveProposal, | ||
| event.NewAttribute(types.AttributeKeyProposalID, fmt.Sprintf("%d", proposal.Id)), | ||
| event.NewAttribute(types.AttributeKeyProposalResult, tagValue), | ||
| event.NewAttribute(types.AttributeKeyProposalLog, logMsg), | ||
| ); err != nil { | ||
| logger.Error("failed to emit event", "error", err) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Emitting events after tallying a proposal is important for transparency. As with previous event emission logic, ensure that error handling is robust and consider adding mechanisms for retrying or alerting in case of failures.
// Suggestion to enhance error handling for event emission failures after tallying
if err := k.environment.EventService.EventManager(ctx).EmitKV(...); err != nil {
// Enhanced error handling logic here
}
| sdkEvents := make([]sdk.Event, 0, len(events)) | ||
| for _, event := range events { | ||
| sdkEvents = append(sdkEvents, sdk.Event(event)) | ||
| // TODO(@julienrbrt): check if events are properly emitted |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
will this TODO be addressed as part of this pr ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will be done in another pr yes, as apparently this wasn't required at all using cache context (and isn't anymore with the branch service)
Description
Closes: #19442
ref: #19542
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
context.Contextinstead ofsdk.Context, aligning with modern best practices for context handling.