Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deps: bump capability to v1.0.1 #6747

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

Description

closes: #XXXX


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega added the dependencies Issues or PRs to update a dependency label Jul 2, 2024
Comment on lines +3 to +5
go 1.22.2

toolchain go1.22.0
toolchain go1.22.3
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This gets updated when I do make tidy-all...

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is one of the dependencies requiring a more recent version?

@crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor Author

crodriguezvega commented Jul 3, 2024

Opening this for review, although yesterday I saw something strange: locally, VS Code indicates in the go.mod that instead of picking up cosmossdk.io/core v0.11.0 (which is the one specified in the go.mod), picks up v0.12.0, which gives build errors. If somebody else could try locally as well to check if they have the same behaviour, that would be nice.

e2e/go.mod Outdated
@@ -281,3 +282,5 @@ replace github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/modules/light-clients/08-wasm => ../modules/lig
replace github.com/syndtr/goleveldb => github.com/syndtr/goleveldb v1.0.1-0.20210819022825-2ae1ddf74ef7

replace github.com/gogo/protobuf => github.com/regen-network/protobuf v1.3.3-alpha.regen.1

replace cosmossdk.io/core => cosmossdk.io/core v0.11.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can repro, still tryint to figure out why it is getting bumped

e2e/go.mod Outdated
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ require (
cosmossdk.io/api v0.7.5 // indirect
cosmossdk.io/client/v2 v2.0.0-beta.2 // indirect
cosmossdk.io/collections v0.4.0 // indirect
cosmossdk.io/core v0.12.0 // indirect
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

couldn't figure out something that was bumping this indirect? switching it just makes things happy. if you remember how/when this was bumped, that would be helpful!

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jul 4, 2024

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8c79fac Jul 4, 2024
88 of 94 checks passed
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega deleted the carlos/capability-v1.0.1 branch July 4, 2024 12:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Issues or PRs to update a dependency
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants