chore: add name for protobuf break workflow

[colin-axner]

Looking into #376, I was unable to add the buf breaking check as required, I believe due to a missing name (which I have added). I'm unsure if it'll be problematic that this CI won't be run on every pr?

[damiannolan]

Happy to merge and see how things go!

[damiannolan]

Looks like the protobuf workflow did not run on this PR. Probably due to a file filter(?) I assume!

It hasn't been run in over 2 weeks so this can't be selected as a requirement check for merging to master branch

[colin-axner]

It hasn't been run in over 2 weeks so this can't be selected as a requirement check for merging to master branch

Yea, it's not run on every pr due to file filter. Is there any other changes we want to make to close #376?

[DimitrisJim]

frankly, I think file filters for small projects might also be overkill. Would be fine if we rm'ed that and just added it in future if necessary.

Alternatively, can we do a faux trigger in a PR and then add it?

[colin-axner]

frankly, I think file filters for small projects might also be overkill. Would be fine if we rm'ed that and just added it in future if necessary.

ah that's a great point. I can try to remove the file filter and see if the action runs. Agreed. ics23 gets so few pr's that there's no need to optimize. Tidying up crumbs at that point

[colin-axner]

good idea @DimitrisJim #382