Docs: Typo fix README.md #187
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves a minor typographical correction in the README.md file. Specifically, the word "throug" has been corrected to "through" in a section discussing plugins for multi-chain connections. This change is purely editorial and does not impact the technical content or functionality of the document. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
77-77: Fix additional typo in the same line.While fixing "trough" to "through" improves the text, there's another typo in the same line:
- "were" should be "where" in "there may be cases were this approach"
-Rosetta will try to reflect the node types trough reflection over the node gRPC endpoints, there may be cases were this approach is not enough. +Rosetta will try to reflect the node types through reflection over the node gRPC endpoints, there may be cases where this approach is not enough.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~77-~77: The preposition “through” seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...etta will try to reflect the node types trough reflection over the node gRPC endpoints...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION)
[uncategorized] ~77-~77: “were” seems less likely than “where”.
Context: ...node gRPC endpoints, there may be cases were this approach is not enough. It is poss...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CPT_WERE_WHERE)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint PR
[error] Pull request title does not follow conventional commits format. Title 'Typo fix README.md' is missing required prefix (e.g., fix:, feat:, docs:, etc.)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~77-~77: The preposition “through” seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...etta will try to reflect the node types trough reflection over the node gRPC endpoints...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION)
[uncategorized] ~77-~77: “were” seems less likely than “where”.
Context: ...node gRPC endpoints, there may be cases were this approach is not enough. It is poss...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CPT_WERE_WHERE)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint PR
README.md
[error] Pull request title does not follow conventional commits format. Title 'Typo fix README.md' is missing required prefix (e.g., fix:, feat:, docs:, etc.)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Update PR title to follow conventional commits format.The PR title "Typo fix README.md" needs to follow the conventional commits format. Please update it to:
docs: fix typo in README.mdThis will resolve the pipeline failure:
✅ Verification successful
PR title must follow Conventional Commits format
The repository explicitly requires PR titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification. For documentation changes like README.md updates, the
docs:prefix is mandatory as per the repository's PR templates.Please update your PR title to:
docs: fix typo in README.md🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if similar PRs follow the conventional commit format gh pr list --search "typo fix" --state all --json title --limit 5Length of output: 302
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for commit convention documentation fd -t f -e md "CONTRIBUTING|DEVELOP" --exec cat {} \; rg -i "commit|conventional|pr title" .github/Length of output: 965
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~77-~77: The preposition “through” seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...etta will try to reflect the node types trough reflection over the node gRPC endpoints...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION)
[uncategorized] ~77-~77: “were” seems less likely than “where”.
Context: ...node gRPC endpoints, there may be cases were this approach is not enough. It is poss...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CPT_WERE_WHERE)
[uncategorized] ~79-~79: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: ..., it is required to set up prefixes and registering zone specific interfaces through plugin...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)
[uncategorized] ~79-~79: When ‘zone-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ired to set up prefixes and registering zone specific interfaces through plugins. Each plugi...(SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint PR
[error] Pull request title does not follow conventional commits format. Title 'Typo fix README.md' is missing required prefix (e.g., fix:, feat:, docs:, etc.)
Fixed a typo in README.md, changing "trough" to "through" for improved accuracy and readability. Ensured the documentation maintains a professional tone.
Summary by CodeRabbit