[stmt.expr] use grammarterm for expression #6469
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jensmaurer
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2023
|
@Eisenwave Could you please rebase? |
wg21bot
added
the
needs rebase
Eisenwave
force-pushed
the
grammarterm-null-statement
branch
from
84019bc
to
a90f331
Compare
jensmaurer
approved these changes
Dec 22, 2023
jensmaurer
removed
the
needs rebase
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this paragraph, expression literally refers to when the expresssion grammar term is missing in the syntax (included in the same paragraph):
It feels more appropriate to style it as a
grammartermdue to this strong connection, instead of simple prose.