-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 145
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ec2): fix ipv6 field issues in ec2 group #109
Merged
+69
−4
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we usually include both conflicting fields in the IgnoredFields slice.
@ulucinar @sergenyalcin please keep me honest here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, agreed. When the native schema declares two configuration arguments as mutually exclusive, we need to ignore them both during late-initialization because we may have set either of them under
spec.forProvider
and the unset one could be late-initialized at runtime causing a conflict. The argumentipv6_addresses
is declared to conflict with theipv6_address_count
and similarly,ipv6_address_count
is declared to conflict with withipv6_addresses
.In this specific case, the relationship is mutual, i.e.,
ipv6_addresses
&ipv6_address_count
are mutually exclusive as dictated in the native (Terraform) schema. In theory, this may not always be true (consider a case in which if argumenta
is set thenb
gets initialized froma
but the reverse is not true, i.e., ifb
is set,a
does not get initialized). I don't know any practical examples of this and I think we had better assume a mutual relationship for late-initialization.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Included
ipv6_addresses
toIgnoredFields
.