-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ft/add next seo #1308
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Ft/add next seo #1308
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduced involve the addition of SEO capabilities to a Next.js application. A new configuration file, Changes
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for staging-dacade ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
next-seo.config.ts (1)
3-6
: Consider enhancing the title and descriptionWhile the basic SEO properties are set up correctly, there's room for improvement:
The title "Dacade site name" appears to be a placeholder. Consider using a more specific and descriptive title that accurately represents your platform.
The description, while concise, could be more detailed and include relevant keywords. Aim for a description that's between 150-160 characters for optimal display in search results.
Example improvements:
title: "Dacade: Peer-to-Peer Learning Platform for Web3 Skills", description: "Dacade offers interactive courses and hands-on projects in blockchain, smart contracts, and decentralized applications. Learn, collaborate, and earn crypto rewards.",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/yarn.lock
,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- next-seo.config.ts (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/components/ui/MetaData.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/pages/_app.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
next-seo.config.ts (1)
1-1
: LGTM: Correct import and type assertionThe import of
NextSeoProps
and the type assertion at the end of the export are correctly implemented. This ensures proper type checking and adherence to the Next.js SEO configuration structure.Also applies to: 24-24
src/components/ui/MetaData.tsx (2)
3-3
: LGTM: NextSeo import added correctly.The import of
NextSeo
from the 'next-seo' package is correctly placed and aligns with the PR objective of enhancing SEO capabilities.
Line range hint
1-31
: Overall, good implementation of SEO capabilities.The changes to the
MetaData
component successfully introduce SEO capabilities using thenext-seo
library, which aligns with the PR objectives. The existing functionality for meta tags is preserved, ensuring backward compatibility.A few refinements have been suggested to optimize the SEO implementation and avoid potential issues. Once these are addressed, the changes will significantly enhance the application's SEO capabilities.
src/pages/_app.tsx (3)
13-14
: LGTM: New imports for SEO enhancement.The new imports for
DefaultSeo
andSEO
are correctly placed and necessary for the SEO enhancement mentioned in the PR objectives.
13-14
: Summary: SEO enhancement successfully implemented.The changes in this file effectively implement the SEO enhancement as outlined in the PR objectives. The addition of the
DefaultSeo
component and necessary imports is done correctly and follows best practices for Next.js applications. These changes will apply the SEO configuration globally, potentially improving the application's search engine visibility.To ensure completeness:
- Verify that the
next-seo.config.ts
file contains all necessary SEO configurations.- Consider adding appropriate SEO tags to individual pages where more specific metadata is required.
- Test the application to ensure that the SEO tags are being correctly rendered in the HTML output.
Also applies to: 71-71
71-71
: LGTM: DefaultSeo component added correctly.The
DefaultSeo
component is correctly placed within the main render method, ensuring that the SEO configuration is applied globally across the application. This addition aligns well with the PR objective of enhancing SEO capabilities.To ensure the SEO configuration is complete and correct, please review the contents of the
next-seo.config.ts
file. You can use the following script to display its contents:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: SEO configuration is correct.
The
next-seo.config.ts
file is properly configured, ensuring that SEO settings are correctly applied across the application.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the contents of the next-seo.config.ts file cat next-seo.config.tsLength of output: 618
package.json (2)
59-59
: LGTM: Addition of next-seo packageThe addition of
next-seo
(version ^6.6.0) aligns well with the PR objective of enhancing SEO capabilities for the application. This package is a popular choice for managing SEO in Next.js applications and should provide the necessary tools to implement the desired SEO improvements.
59-59
: Verify compatibility with updated dev dependenciesThe updates to dev dependencies, particularly the major version bump for
@testing-library/react
from 14.x to 15.x, may introduce breaking changes. While these updates can improve the development and testing environment, it's important to ensure they don't negatively impact the existing test suite.Actions to consider:
- Review the changelog for
@testing-library/react
v15 to understand any breaking changes.- Run the test suite to verify that all tests pass with the updated dependencies.
- Update any tests or testing utilities if necessary to accommodate changes in the new version.
To check for any immediate issues with the updated dependencies, run the following script:
twitter: { | ||
cardType: "summary_large_image", | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance Twitter card configuration
The Twitter card type is correctly set to "summary_large_image". However, the Twitter card configuration could be more comprehensive to improve the appearance of shared content on Twitter.
Consider adding the following properties to your Twitter card configuration:
twitter: {
handle: '@YourTwitterHandle',
site: '@YourSiteTwitterHandle',
cardType: 'summary_large_image',
},
These additional properties will associate the shared content with your Twitter account and improve its presentation on the platform.
next-seo.config.ts
Outdated
openGraph: { | ||
type: "website", | ||
locale: "en", | ||
url: "https://dacade.org/", | ||
siteName: "Dacade", | ||
images: [ | ||
{ | ||
url: "/img/opengraph.webp", | ||
width: 1200, | ||
height: 630, | ||
alt: "DACADE", | ||
}, | ||
], | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use absolute URL for OpenGraph image
The OpenGraph configuration is well-structured, but there's one potential improvement:
Consider using an absolute URL for the OpenGraph image instead of a relative one. This ensures that the image is correctly displayed when your content is shared on various platforms, regardless of the context.
Replace the relative image URL with an absolute one:
images: [
{
- url: "/img/opengraph.webp",
+ url: "https://dacade.org/img/opengraph.webp",
width: 1200,
height: 630,
alt: "DACADE",
},
],
This change will make your OpenGraph image more robust across different sharing contexts.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
openGraph: { | |
type: "website", | |
locale: "en", | |
url: "https://dacade.org/", | |
siteName: "Dacade", | |
images: [ | |
{ | |
url: "/img/opengraph.webp", | |
width: 1200, | |
height: 630, | |
alt: "DACADE", | |
}, | |
], | |
}, | |
openGraph: { | |
type: "website", | |
locale: "en", | |
url: "https://dacade.org/", | |
siteName: "Dacade", | |
images: [ | |
{ | |
url: "https://dacade.org/img/opengraph.webp", | |
width: 1200, | |
height: 630, | |
alt: "DACADE", | |
}, | |
], | |
}, |
src/components/ui/MetaData.tsx
Outdated
<NextSeo title={title || "dacade.org"} description={description || ""} /> | ||
{title && <title data-testid="page-title">{getMetadataTitle(title, community as string)}</title>} | ||
{metas.map((meta, index) => ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Duplicate <title>
tag detected in MetaData component.
The NextSeo
component and a separate <title>
tag are both used in src/components/ui/MetaData.tsx
, leading to duplicate title tags.
- Remove the
<title>
tag and handle titles exclusively withNextSeo
to avoid duplication.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider refining SEO implementation and removing potential duplication.
The addition of the NextSeo
component is a good step towards improving SEO. However, there are a few points to consider:
- The description fallback to an empty string might not be ideal for SEO. Consider providing a default description.
- There's potential for duplicate title tags. The
NextSeo
component sets a title, but there's also a conditional rendering of a<title>
element.
Consider applying these changes:
- <NextSeo title={title || "dacade.org"} description={description || ""} />
+ <NextSeo
+ title={getMetadataTitle(title || "dacade.org", community as string)}
+ description={description || "Default description of dacade.org"}
+ />
- {title && <title data-testid="page-title">{getMetadataTitle(title, community as string)}</title>}
This change will:
- Provide a default description for SEO.
- Use the
getMetadataTitle
function for consistency and remove the potential for duplicate titles. - Remove the separate
<title>
tag, asNextSeo
will handle this.
To ensure this change doesn't break existing functionality, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of title tags across the codebase
# Test: Search for title tags usage. Expect: No direct usage of <title> tags
rg --type tsx --type jsx '<title'
# Test: Search for NextSeo usage. Expect: Consistent usage across components
rg --type tsx --type jsx '<NextSeo'
Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of <title> tags across the codebase
# Test: Search for <title> tags in .tsx and .jsx files. Expect: Minimal or no direct usage.
rg '<title' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx'
# Test: Search for <NextSeo> usage in .tsx and .jsx files. Expect: Consistent usage across components.
rg '<NextSeo' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx'
Length of output: 2294
Submit a pull request
Replace any ":question:" below with information about your pull request.
Pull Request Details
Provide details about your pull request and what it adds, fixes, or changes.
❓
Breaking Changes
Describe what features are broken by this pull request and why, if any.
❓
Issues Fixed
Enter the issue numbers resolved by this pull request below, if any.
Other Relevant Information
Provide any other important details below.