Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Generate rules for DLT as Python dictionary #148

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

alexott
Copy link
Contributor

@alexott alexott commented Feb 3, 2025

Changes

This will allow to get generated rules and maybe process them, for example, store them in the Delta table or database for later reuse. This was inspired by the blog post about using DQX for checking hundreds of tables.

Linked issues

Tests

  • manually tested
  • added unit tests
  • added integration tests

This will allow to get generated rules and maybe process them, for example, store them in
the Delta table or database for later reuse.  This was inspired by the blog post about
using DQX for checking hundreds of tables.

Signed-off-by: Alex Ott <[email protected]>
@alexott alexott requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2025 07:29
@alexott alexott requested review from nehamilak-db and removed request for a team February 3, 2025 07:29
@alexott alexott requested a review from mwojtyczka February 3, 2025 07:29
Signed-off-by: Alex Ott <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

✅ 114/114 passed, 1 skipped, 27m56s total

Running from acceptance #317

Copy link
Contributor

@mwojtyczka mwojtyczka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mwojtyczka mwojtyczka merged commit 3104f69 into main Feb 3, 2025
8 checks passed
@mwojtyczka mwojtyczka deleted the feature-dlt-rules-as-dict branch February 3, 2025 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants