Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(systemMetadata): add pipeline names to system metadata #8684

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 30, 2023

Conversation

hsheth2
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsheth2 hsheth2 commented Aug 21, 2023

Follow up on #8672

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata label Aug 21, 2023
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ def _try_reformat_with_black(code: str) -> str:

class WorkUnitRecordExtractorConfig(ConfigModel):
set_system_metadata = True
set_system_metadata_pipeline_name = (
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you set this from a recipe?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

technically yes, but it's kinda janky

source:
	type: ...
	config: ...
	extractor: "generic"
	extractor_config:
		set_system_metadata_pipeline_name: True

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in reality, nobody uses this extractor abstraction so effectively no

@hsheth2 hsheth2 added the merge-pending-ci A PR that has passed review and should be merged once CI is green. label Aug 30, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@jjoyce0510 jjoyce0510 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - Thank you!

@hsheth2 hsheth2 merged commit 1282e5b into datahub-project:master Aug 30, 2023
52 checks passed
@hsheth2 hsheth2 deleted the pipeline-name branch August 30, 2023 20:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata merge-pending-ci A PR that has passed review and should be merged once CI is green.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants