Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: build examples on ci #341

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

feat: build examples on ci #341

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

MartianGreed
Copy link
Collaborator

@MartianGreed MartianGreed commented Nov 27, 2024

Avoid merging that might break examples

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Introduced a new step in the CI workflow for building examples to enhance the build process.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new step in the GitHub Actions CI workflow specifically for building examples. The new step, titled "Build examples," executes the command pnpm run build-examples and is positioned after the existing "Build packages" step. The overall structure of the workflow remains intact, with no other modifications made to the setup or existing commands.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yaml Added a new step named "Build examples" to execute pnpm run build-examples after "Build packages."

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: add docs build: #291: The addition of a new workflow in .github/workflows/docs.yaml may relate to the overall CI/CD process, similar to the new step added in .github/workflows/ci.yaml for building examples, indicating a focus on enhancing automation in the project.

Poem

🐇 In the garden where code does bloom,
A step was added to clear the gloom.
"Build examples," it proudly sings,
With pnpm, it dances and swings.
In workflows bright, our projects thrive,
Together in code, we come alive! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yaml (2)

46-48: LGTM! The new step aligns with the PR objective.

The addition of the "Build examples" step after package builds is a logical placement that will help catch breaking changes early.

Consider these improvements for robustness:

 - name: Build examples
-  run: pnpm run build-examples
+  run: pnpm run build-examples
+  timeout-minutes: 10
+  continue-on-error: false

Line range hint 1-48: Consider caching example build artifacts

The workflow has a good progression of steps, but could benefit from caching example build outputs to speed up subsequent runs.

Consider adding a cache step for example builds similar to how package builds might be cached. This would improve CI performance, especially for frequent updates to examples.

Example cache configuration:

- uses: actions/cache@v3
  with:
    path: examples/**/dist
    key: ${{ runner.os }}-examples-${{ hashFiles('examples/**') }}
    restore-keys: |
      ${{ runner.os }}-examples-
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c8cac6 and c76c74b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yaml (1)

46-48: Verify the build-examples script exists

Let's ensure the referenced script is properly defined.

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify if the referenced build script exists.


The build-examples script is properly defined and configured

The verification confirms that:

  • The build-examples script is defined in the root package.json
  • It points to ./scripts/build-examples.sh which exists and contains proper build logic
  • The script is set up to build all example projects in the repository
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if build-examples script exists in package.json files
# Expected: Find at least one package.json with the build-examples script

# Search for package.json files and check their contents
fd package.json --type f --exec sh -c 'echo "=== Checking {}" && cat {} | jq -r "select(.scripts != null) | .scripts | select(.\"build-examples\" != null)"'

Length of output: 1667


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the build-examples.sh script exists and show its contents
fd build-examples.sh --type f --exec sh -c 'echo "=== Found script: {}" && cat {}'

Length of output: 805

@MartianGreed MartianGreed merged commit 7110496 into main Nov 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@MartianGreed MartianGreed deleted the feat/ci-build-examples branch November 27, 2024 11:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant