Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✅(jest) Better scoping of tests execution #5375

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dubzzz
Copy link
Owner

@dubzzz dubzzz commented Oct 28, 2024

Description

Tests used to be scoped via their configuration file. Starting at this PR, they will be scoped via dedicated directories.

It would avoid having Jest to scan all files of the directory including some not relevant for the test itself. With new scoping the directory being passed will be only for this test, not for others. As such Jest can scan all of it.

ChecklistDon't delete this checklist and make sure you do the following before opening the PR

  • The name of my PR follows gitmoji specification
  • My PR references one of several related issues (if any)
    • New features or breaking changes must come with an associated Issue or Discussion
    • My PR does not add any new dependency without an associated Issue or Discussion
  • My PR includes bumps details, please run yarn bump and flag the impacts properly
  • My PR adds relevant tests and they would have failed without my PR (when applicable)

Advanced

  • Category: ✅ Add or update tests
  • Impacts: Test stability and efficiency

Tests used to be scoped via their configuration file. Starting at this PR, they will be scoped via dedicated directories.

It would avoid having Jest to scan all files of the directory including some not relevant for the test itself. With new scoping the directory being passed will be only for this test, not for others. As such Jest can scan all of it.
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 28, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4f4ed9b

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@dubzzz dubzzz enabled auto-merge (squash) October 28, 2024 11:15
Copy link

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 4f4ed9b:

Sandbox Source
@fast-check/examples Configuration

Copy link
Contributor

👋 A preview of the new documentation is available at: http://671f72e414412d120e9de24d--dubzzz-fast-check.netlify.app

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.27%. Comparing base (f893f50) to head (4f4ed9b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5375      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.29%   95.27%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         234      234              
  Lines       10478    10478              
  Branches     2796     2795       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         9985     9983       -2     
- Misses        493      495       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 95.27% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
unit-tests-18.x-Linux 95.27% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
unit-tests-20.x-Linux 95.27% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests-22.x-Linux 95.27% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests-latest-Linux 95.27% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dubzzz dubzzz merged commit e0d1ced into main Oct 28, 2024
72 of 73 checks passed
@dubzzz dubzzz deleted the better-test-run-jest branch October 28, 2024 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant