Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix some function names #2073

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

timesince
Copy link

@timesince timesince commented Aug 12, 2024

Changelist

[Describe or list the changes made in this PR]

fix some function names

Test Plan

[Describe how this PR was tested (if applicable)]

Author/Reviewer Checklist

  • If this PR has changes that result in a different app state given the same prior state and transaction list, manually add the state-breaking label.
  • If the PR has breaking postgres changes to the indexer add the indexer-postgres-breaking label.
  • If this PR isn't state-breaking but has changes that modify behavior in PrepareProposal or ProcessProposal, manually add the label proposal-breaking.
  • If this PR is one of many that implement a specific feature, manually label them all feature:[feature-name].
  • If you wish to for mergify-bot to automatically create a PR to backport your change to a release branch, manually add the label backport/[branch-name].
  • Manually add any of the following labels: refactor, chore, bug.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated function names and documentation for better clarity regarding market price updates.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected naming inconsistencies in test functions to enhance readability and maintainability.
  • Documentation

    • Improved comments to accurately reflect the functionality of functions related to JSON representation and market prices.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 12, 2024

Walkthrough

This update introduces several naming changes to enhance clarity and consistency across the codebase. Key functions have been renamed to better reflect their purposes, particularly in relation to market price updates and testing scenarios. These modifications maintain the original functionality while ensuring that code documentation aligns accurately with the current implementation and intent.

Changes

Files Change Summary
protocol/app/process/market_prices.go Renamed function from DecodeAddPremiumVotesTx to DecodeUpdateMarketPricesTx for clarity on functionality.
protocol/daemons/pricefeed/client/client_integration_test.go Renamed test function from TestUpdateMarkets_PartialUpdates to TestUpdateMarkets_PartialUpdate for singular focus.
protocol/daemons/pricefeed/client/price_fetcher/price_fetcher_test.go Corrected function name from asserQueryHandlerCalledWithMarkets to assertQueryHandlerCalledWithMarkets for consistency.
protocol/lib/json.go Simplified function name from MaybeGetStructJsonString to MaybeGetJsonString, clarifying its broader applicability.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant PriceDaemon
    participant PriceFetcher
    participant JSONProcessor

    Client->>PriceDaemon: Request market price update
    PriceDaemon->>PriceFetcher: Fetch current prices
    PriceFetcher->>PriceDaemon: Return fetched prices
    PriceDaemon->>JSONProcessor: Convert prices to JSON
    JSONProcessor-->>PriceDaemon: Return JSON output
    PriceDaemon-->>Client: Send updated market prices
Loading

🐰 In a world where prices sway,
Functions dance and change their way.
With a hop and a twist, names align,
Clarity blooms, oh how they shine!
A joyful code, we celebrate,
For every change, we elevate!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3930d14 and 871cb13.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • protocol/app/process/market_prices.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/daemons/pricefeed/client/client_integration_test.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/daemons/pricefeed/client/price_fetcher/price_fetcher_test.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/lib/json.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • protocol/daemons/pricefeed/client/client_integration_test.go
  • protocol/daemons/pricefeed/client/price_fetcher/price_fetcher_test.go
  • protocol/lib/json.go
Additional comments not posted (1)
protocol/app/process/market_prices.go (1)

21-21: Documentation update aligns with function purpose.

The updated documentation comment accurately reflects the function's role in decoding and validating market price transactions. This change improves clarity and consistency with the function's implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant