Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#410] Evolve options API without bumping major version every time #432

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

ruspl-afed
Copy link
Member

  • extract predefined preference metadata to another "noimplement" interface

true, //
LspEditorUiMessages.LspEditorPreferencePage_enable_tidy, //
LspEditorUiMessages.LspEditorPreferencePage_enable_tidy);
interface Predefined {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jonahgraham this should reduce API breakage to a minimum.
WDYT?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you try API tools?

To repeat my other comment, I think having breaking API according to API tools is fine, just we should document that it is ok to add filters. I'm not sure restructuring the whole code like this is needed, but I don't have an objection.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here. LGTM

true, //
LspEditorUiMessages.LspEditorPreferencePage_enable_tidy, //
LspEditorUiMessages.LspEditorPreferencePage_enable_tidy);
interface Predefined {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here. LGTM

…ery time

* extract predefined preference metadata to another "noimplement"
interface
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants