Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(policy): add constraint function to evaluate gaia-x compliance #13

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

YassirSellami
Copy link

@YassirSellami YassirSellami commented Jun 15, 2023

What this PR changes/adds

Adding a constraint function to use Gaia-x compliance claims during evaluation access control and negotiation policies.

Why it does that

This can be useful to add policies related to Gaia-x compliant participants

Further notes

This also verify the integrity of the Gaia-x compliance credentials

Checklist

  • added appropriate tests?
  • performed checkstyle check locally?
  • added/updated copyright headers?
  • documented public classes/methods?
  • added/updated relevant documentation?
  • assigned appropriate label? (exclude from changelog with label no-changelog)
  • formatted title correctly? (take a look at the CONTRIBUTING and Etiquette for pull requests for details)

##Linked Issue(s)
Issue#14

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are always happy to welcome new contributors ❤️ To make things easier for everyone, please make sure to follow our contribution guidelines, check if you have already signed the ECA, and relate this pull request to an existing issue or discussion.

@YassirSellami YassirSellami force-pushed the feat/add-compliance-constraint-function branch from b46de0e to ee3c0f1 Compare July 4, 2023 08:27
@YassirSellami YassirSellami force-pushed the feat/add-compliance-constraint-function branch from ee3c0f1 to a3ba11b Compare July 4, 2023 08:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant