Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: added MaterialPartnerRelation and accompanying services #19

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 18, 2023

Conversation

tom-rm-meyer-ISST
Copy link
Contributor

@tom-rm-meyer-ISST tom-rm-meyer-ISST commented Aug 18, 2023

Description

Currently the relationship of the material and partner were not correctly mapped according to m:n scenarios based on one material having e.g. multiple suppliers each with a different supplier number.

This commit handles the domain section (model + repositories) and the corresponding logic layer.

Pre-review checks

Please ensure to do as many of the following checks as possible, before asking for committer review:

@tom-rm-meyer-ISST
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure, why dependencies are not up to date here. I had rerun the dashtool but no changes were detected.

Copy link
Member

@mhellmeier mhellmeier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, since the failed quality check pipeline is addressed in eclipse-tractusx/sig-infra#230

@mhellmeier mhellmeier merged commit 6f14f0a into eclipse-tractusx:main Aug 18, 2023
7 of 8 checks passed
@tom-rm-meyer-ISST tom-rm-meyer-ISST mentioned this pull request Aug 18, 2023
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants