Make COVID-19 policy more understandable / more friendly #6
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've done a quick pass over the COVID-19 policy to remove any copy-pasting of law/NHS guidance (instead linking/referencing the actual guidance where it makes sense) and to remove a lot of the verbosity associated with "formal" policy. I think a lot of the corporate-style furniture really clouds the intent of the policy, which I think is counter to having a policy that's simple and easy to understand by members.
I've also made some changes to what should happen in Tier 3 / 4 based on my reading of the guidance supplied by government. I couldn't find anything in my reading of the guidance that suggests Hacklab is required by law to close under tier 4, or that only companies with a CNI excemption are permitted to remain open.
The bits I've rewritten, I've tried to approach it from the perspective that we should try and continue to facilitate member access to the space if they deem it necessary, but we should do this in a way which keeps members as safe as possible. This means providing the tools for members to use to communicate intent (booking system, etc) and expecting members to do the right thing.
I've also rewritten a bit of the enforcement section to highlight that it is not punitive, and instead is intended to keep the lab a safe space for all members.
Opinions? I expect this would need a few more changes before it were to get merged, and I'm sure I've missed a few things.