Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Define a better ID for sector storage #474

Closed
Tracked by #347
jmg-duarte opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #483
Closed
Tracked by #347

Define a better ID for sector storage #474

jmg-duarte opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #483

Comments

@jmg-duarte
Copy link
Contributor 

          Most likely we should not store it as `piece_cid`, as sector will contain multiple pieces, but by a SectorId,

Originally posted by @th7nder in #470 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

feat: integrate pre-commit/create replica with extrinsic call on pipeline eigerco/polka-storage
1 participant
@jmg-duarte