Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x-pack/filebeat/input/cel: add ability to remove request trace logs #39969

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

efd6
Copy link
Contributor

@efd6 efd6 commented Jun 20, 2024

Proposed commit message

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client integrations.


Similar changes should be made in other inputs that write trace logs.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

Disruptive User Impact

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Logs

@efd6 efd6 added enhancement Filebeat Filebeat backport-skip Skip notification from the automated backport with mergify Team:Security-Service Integrations Security Service Integrations Team labels Jun 20, 2024
@efd6 efd6 self-assigned this Jun 20, 2024
@botelastic botelastic bot added needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label and removed needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label labels Jun 20, 2024
@efd6 efd6 force-pushed the remove_trace_logs_cel branch 2 times, most recently from b226c1e to 8952f2c Compare June 20, 2024 01:16
@efd6 efd6 marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2024 03:28
@efd6 efd6 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 20, 2024 03:28
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/security-service-integrations (Team:Security-Service Integrations)

Copy link
Contributor

@chrisberkhout chrisberkhout left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cleaning up sensitive data seems like a good idea, but on the other hand I think there's a good argument to be made that comprehensive management of the log files it generates is beyond the scope of beats, especially since unlinking the file will probably leave the data on the block device, and attempting to overwrite it would probably still keep it around (due to CoW file systems or SSD leveling).

There are some issues to work out with the implementation.

x-pack/filebeat/input/cel/input_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x-pack/filebeat/input/cel/input.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x-pack/filebeat/input/cel/input.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@chrisberkhout
Copy link
Contributor

Forgot to mention I do like the choice of a new option and how it's done in a backwards-compatible way.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 20, 2024

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b remove_trace_logs_cel upstream/remove_trace_logs_cel
git merge upstream/main
git push upstream remove_trace_logs_cel

Copy link
Contributor

@chrisberkhout chrisberkhout left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 21, 2024

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b remove_trace_logs_cel upstream/remove_trace_logs_cel
git merge upstream/main
git push upstream remove_trace_logs_cel

efd6 added 2 commits June 22, 2024 06:40
The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
@efd6 efd6 enabled auto-merge (squash) June 21, 2024 21:12
@efd6 efd6 merged commit 8b89f79 into elastic:main Jun 21, 2024
15 of 18 checks passed
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
This is a replay of elastic#39969, but for the HTTPJSON input.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
This is a replay of elastic#39969, but for the HTTPJSON input.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
…dd ability to remove request trace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the entity analytics
providers.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
…dd ability to remove request trace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the entity analytics
providers.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
…ace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the http_endpoint input.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
…ace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the http_endpoint input.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
…ogs (#40003)

This is a replay of #39969, but for the HTTPJSON input.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
…ace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the http_endpoint input.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
…dd ability to remove request trace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the entity analytics
providers.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2024
…ace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the http_endpoint input.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2024
…dd ability to remove request trace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the entity analytics
providers.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2024
…ace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the http_endpoint input.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2024
…dd ability to remove request trace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the entity analytics
providers.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2024
…ace logs (#40005)

This is essentially a replay of #39969, but for the http_endpoint input.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit to efd6/beats that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2024
…dd ability to remove request trace logs

This is essentially a replay of elastic#39969, but for the entity analytics
providers.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
efd6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2024
…dd ability to remove request trace logs (#40004)

This is essentially a replay of #39969, but for the entity analytics
providers.

The previous configuration system did not allow users to remove trace
logs from agents after they are no longer needed. This is potential
security risk as it leaves potentially sensitive information on the file
system beyond its required lifetime. The mechanism for communicating to
the input whether to write logs is not currently powerful enough to
indicate that existing logs should be removed without deleting logs from
other instances. So add an enabled configuration option to allow the
target name to be sent independently of whether the files should be
written or removed.

The new option is optional, defaulting to the previous behaviour so
that it can be opted into via progressive repair in the client
integrations.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-skip Skip notification from the automated backport with mergify enhancement Filebeat Filebeat Team:Security-Service Integrations Security Service Integrations Team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants