Change TaskStatus to UserDefinedValue #2250
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Following you can find the validation results for the APIs you have changed.
You can validate these APIs yourself by using the |
technige
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2023
swallez
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2023
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Wallez <[email protected]>
swallez
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Wallez <[email protected]>
swallez
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replaces
TaskStatuswith aUserDefinedValue. Fixes #2249.In the ES code base this is just an interface with this comment: "These can vary wildly from task to task because each task is implemented differently but we should try to keep each task consistent from version to version where possible".
So we cannot make any assumption on the fields that will actually be there.