-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 162
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
APM: add known issue of lazy rollover bug #4459
Conversation
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]>
A documentation preview will be available soon. Request a new doc build by commenting
If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here. |
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]>
The version check would fail any APM document produced with a different version of APM server compared to the version of the installed APM’s ingest pipeline. | ||
In 8.13.0 the version check in the ingest pipeline was removed. | ||
However, in 8.15.0 APM Server has a different way of managing data streams, that is not aware of the version check present in the ingest pipeline. | ||
Thus, the leftover version check remains and prevents the ingestion of data. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find this a bit confusing, and the main RC is the lazy rollover bug; how about:
Due to the combination of an internal change in how apm data management assets are set up from 8.15
onwards and a bug in Elasticsearch, related to lazy rollover of data streams, the ingestion pipeline conducting the version check is not removed on upgrade and prevents the ingestion of data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was esitant to add a link to the ES issue, but yeah that makes it read better
Co-authored-by: simitt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: simitt <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 66a73ef)
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: simitt <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 66a73ef)
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: simitt <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 66a73ef) Co-authored-by: Francesco Gualazzi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: simitt <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 66a73ef) Co-authored-by: Francesco Gualazzi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: simitt <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 66a73ef)
Description
Add a known issue section for APM to explain a problem occurring when upgrading to 8.15.0.
Documentation sets edited in this PR
Check all that apply.
docs/en/observability/*
)docs/en/serverless/*
)docs/en/integrations/*
)Related issue
Closes #
Checklist
Follow-up tasks
Select one.