feat: import datasets #7
Conversation
closes #6
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new GitHub Actions workflow for continuous integration that runs tests and linting across multiple Python versions. Updates to the Changes
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Files selected for processing (6)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Additional context usedRuff
Markdownlint
Additional comments not posted (12)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
closes #6
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/run-all-steps.yml (2)
26-31: Improve the linting step by failing the job if there are linting errors.The job doesn't fail if there are linting errors. This can be improved by removing the
--exit-zeroflag from the second flake8 command.Apply this diff to improve the linting step:
# stop the build if there are Python syntax errors or undefined names flake8 . --count --select=E9,F63,F7,F82 --show-source --statistics - # exit-zero treats all errors as warnings. The GitHub editor is 127 chars wide - flake8 . --count --exit-zero --max-complexity=10 --max-line-length=127 --statistics + # The GitHub editor is 127 chars wide + flake8 . --count --max-complexity=10 --max-line-length=127 --statistics
35-37: Incomplete Implementation inrun_all_steps.pyThe
run_all_steps.pyscript partially implements its intended functionality by executing data preparation steps. However, the sections for model training and prediction are marked as TODO and need to be completed for the script to function as intended.
- Implement the model training logic in the
Step 2. Train Modelsection.- Implement the prediction logic in the
Step 3. Make Predictionsection.Analysis chain
Verify that the
run_all_steps.pyscript exists and does what it's supposed to do.The job runs a script named
run_all_steps.py. However, the script is not provided for review.Run the following script to verify that the script exists:
If the script exists, review it to ensure that it does what it's supposed to do.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `run_all_steps.py` script exists. # Test: Check if the script exists. Expect: The script exists. fd run_all_steps.pyLength of output: 38
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the contents of the `run_all_steps.py` script for review. # Display the contents of the script. cat run_all_steps.pyLength of output: 600
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
step1_prepare/step1_1_download_data.py (1)
6-6: Consider removing print statements in production code.The file contains print statements that output the URLs and the DataFrames for debugging purposes. While these can be helpful during development, they may not be necessary in production code.
Consider removing the print statements or adding a flag to conditionally execute them based on the environment (e.g., development vs. production).
Also applies to: 8-8, 13-13, 15-15
closes #6
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores