Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added nanocomposite as subclass of nanomaterial #525

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

jmillanacosta
Copy link
Member

Solves #523

@jmillanacosta jmillanacosta linked an issue Feb 16, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@jmillanacosta jmillanacosta self-assigned this Feb 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@egonw egonw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not directly under nanomaterial, and next to http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/npo#NPO_868 ?

@jmillanacosta
Copy link
Member Author

Why not directly under nanomaterial, and next to http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/npo#NPO_868 ?

I agree, when size of the composite is unknown classifying it as a nano-object (nano-structure) might not be ideal

@jmillanacosta jmillanacosta changed the title Added nanocomposite as subclass of 3d nano-object Added nanocomposite as subclass of nanomaterial Feb 16, 2024
@egonw
Copy link
Contributor

egonw commented Feb 16, 2024

Was adding 55 other terms intentional?

@jmillanacosta
Copy link
Member Author

Was adding 55 other terms intentional?

I am lost as to why the first commit 0a39ea0 deleted them but shows no changes (see all these terms in master https://github.com/enanomapper/ontologies/blob/master/config/ncit.iris)

@jmillanacosta jmillanacosta merged commit 45a5333 into master Mar 18, 2024
1 check passed
@jmillanacosta jmillanacosta deleted the 523-term-request-nanocomposite branch March 22, 2024 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[TERM REQUEST] nanocomposite
2 participants