-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ssh: polish docs #9298
Open
u3s
wants to merge
8
commits into
erlang:maint
Choose a base branch
from
u3s:kuba/ssh/polish_docs
base: maint
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
ssh: polish docs #9298
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f08c0bd
ssh: polish docs around types
u3s 0f05242
ssh: fix ssh_sftp:start_channel docs
u3s d39a2aa
ssh: info about receiving large exec output
u3s 7cf85d3
ssh: type categories fixup in ssh manual
u3s 1684061
ssh: move type description for conn_info_channels
u3s 320737a
ssh: typo fix in using_ssh.md
u3s 5471ae5
ssh: fix docs for `options` note
u3s e25585a
ssh: ssh_sftp manual fix
u3s File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is meant with opaque option? This does not make sense to me!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you mean
opaque_
part in type names below?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes! I do not think options can be opaque. You need to know what it is you are setting to be able to set it. Opaque I think is used to say that the user should not care how something "looks" (is represented) it is only an abstract handle that can be used as input to the API functions of the module. A truly opaque value can only be inspected by the module implementing it. And that is why we have some values that are only documented opaque as we want users to be able to match them for equality although we do think it is an API violation to pick them apart and do things with an individual part.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Testing (in-)equality of opaques with the same name is okay in
master
, as it does not leak any information about the contents. You can start looking into making these types actually opaque now :-)