Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spelling/drv2605 initialize #141

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

Spelling/drv2605 initialize #141

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

finger563
Copy link
Contributor

@finger563 finger563 commented Jan 10, 2024

Description

  • Fixes the spelling of Drv2605::initialize(...) to be correct

Motivation and Context

Proper spelling makes the code easier to read and understand and prevents mistakes.

How has this been tested?

In another project using drv2605.

Screenshots (if appropriate, e.g. schematic, board, console logs, lab pictures):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation Update
  • Hardware (schematic, board, system design) change
  • Software change

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have added / updated the documentation related to this change via either README or WIKI

Software

  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have updated the .github/workflows/build.yml file to add my new test to the automated cloud build github action.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.

@finger563 finger563 merged commit 08150cc into main Jan 10, 2024
@finger563 finger563 deleted the spelling/drv2605-initialize branch January 10, 2024 19:09
@finger563 finger563 restored the spelling/drv2605-initialize branch January 10, 2024 19:09
@finger563 finger563 deleted the spelling/drv2605-initialize branch January 10, 2024 19:09
Copy link

✅Static analysis result - no issues found! ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant