Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(advanced_console): Add ESP32-P4 ESP32-C5 model support in 'version' command output (IDFGH-13722) #14593

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ESP32DE
Copy link
Contributor

@ESP32DE ESP32DE commented Sep 17, 2024

Description

This PR enhances the version advanced console command output in the iPerf example to correctly display the model names for the ESP32-P4 and ESP32-C5 microcontrollers. The iPerf example now prints the ESP-IDF version number, chip information, and model name when the "version" command is executed.

Previous Behavior

Before this change, the models ESP32-P4 and ESP32-C5 were displayed as "Unknown".

As an example, the execution before modification serves


IDF Version:v5.4-dev-2744-g59e1838270-dirty
Chip info:
        model:Unknown
        cores:1
        feature:/802.11bgn/BLE/External-Flash:8 MB
        revision number:0

The model is unknown.

New Behavior

After the modification, the model names are correctly displayed.
Here’s an example of the output when using the ESP32-C5:

IDF Version:v5.4-dev-2744-g59e1838270-dirty
Chip info:
        model:ESP32-C5
        cores:1
        feature:/802.11bgn/BLE/External-Flash:8 MB
        revision number:0

The model ESP32C5 is now known and is now correctly printed with the model name ESP32-C5.

The code before


/* 'version' command */
static int get_version(int argc, char **argv)
{
    const char *model;
    esp_chip_info_t info;
    uint32_t flash_size;
    esp_chip_info(&info);

    switch(info.model) {
        case CHIP_ESP32:
            model = "ESP32";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32S2:
            model = "ESP32-S2";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32S3:
            model = "ESP32-S3";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32C3:
            model = "ESP32-C3";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32H2:
            model = "ESP32-H2";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32C2:
            model = "ESP32-C2";
            break;
        default:
            model = "Unknown";
            break;
    }


and the code after the change / add


/* 'version' command */
static int get_version(int argc, char **argv)
{
    const char *model;
    esp_chip_info_t info;
    uint32_t flash_size;
    esp_chip_info(&info);

    switch(info.model) {
        case CHIP_ESP32:
            model = "ESP32";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32S2:
            model = "ESP32-S2";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32S3:
            model = "ESP32-S3";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32C3:
            model = "ESP32-C3";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32H2:
            model = "ESP32-H2";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32C2:
            model = "ESP32-C2";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32P4:
            model = "ESP32-P4";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32C5:
            model = "ESP32-C5";
            break;
        default:
            model = "Unknown";
            break;
    }


Code Changes

The following cases were added to the get_version function:


        case CHIP_ESP32P4:
            model = "ESP32-P4";
            break;
        case CHIP_ESP32C5:
            model = "ESP32-C5";
            break;


The ESP32-P4 and ESP32-C5 models have been added.
Example ESP32-C5

iperf> version
IDF Version:v5.4-dev-2744-g59e1838270-dirty
Chip info:
        model:ESP32-C5
        cores:1
        feature:/802.11bgn/BLE/External-Flash:8 MB
        revision number:0
iperf>

Attached Picture as Link

addModel_ESP32C5_ESP32P4

Related

Testing

Tested with ESP32-C5-DevKitC-1 and iPerf example and modification
successful printed out the right found model name

iperf> version
IDF Version:v5.4-dev-2744-g59e1838270-dirty
Chip info:
        model:ESP32-C5
        cores:1
        feature:/802.11bgn/BLE/External-Flash:8 MB
        revision number:0
iperf>

#14021 (comment)

#12996


Checklist

Before submitting a Pull Request, please ensure the following:

  • [x ] 🚨 This PR does not introduce breaking changes.
  • All CI checks (GH Actions) pass.
  • Documentation is updated as needed.
  • Tests are updated or added as necessary.
  • [x ] Code is well-commented, especially in complex areas.
  • [x ] Git history is clean — commits are squashed to the minimum necessary.

…in 'version' command output


the model ESP32P4 and ESP32C5 was unknown on 
version command in iperf example
add model ESP32P4 and ESP32C5
which prints out model names now by the knowed model
ESP32P4 = "ESP32-P4"
ESP32C5 = "ESP32-C5"

example app: iperf  

before:
iperf> version
IDF Version:v5.4-dev-2744-g59e1838270-dirty
Chip info:
        model:Unknown
        cores:1
        feature:/802.11bgn/BLE/External-Flash:8 MB
        revision number:0
iperf>

after this add model is knowed now

iperf> version
IDF Version:v5.4-dev-2744-g59e1838270-dirty
Chip info:
        model:ESP32-C5
        cores:1
        feature:/802.11bgn/BLE/External-Flash:8 MB
        revision number:0
iperf>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Messages
📖 🎉 Good Job! All checks are passing!

👋 Hello ESP32DE, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests via this public GitHub repository.

This GitHub project is public mirror of our internal git repository

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved, we synchronize it into our internal git repository.
4. In the internal git repository we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
5. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.
5. On next sync from the internal git repository merged change will appear in this public GitHub repository.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 27b5f62

@espressif-bot espressif-bot added the Status: Opened Issue is new label Sep 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title feat(advanced_console): Add ESP32-P4 ESP32-C5 model support in 'version' command output feat(advanced_console): Add ESP32-P4 ESP32-C5 model support in 'version' command output (IDFGH-13722) Sep 17, 2024
@sudeep-mohanty
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the contribution @ESP32DE! LGTM!

@sudeep-mohanty
Copy link
Collaborator

sha=27b5f6298c34431549c7e04690ce2cefa2fb7f52

@sudeep-mohanty sudeep-mohanty added the PR-Sync-Merge Pull request sync as merge commit label Sep 17, 2024
@espressif-bot espressif-bot added Status: Reviewing Issue is being reviewed and removed Status: Opened Issue is new labels Sep 17, 2024
@espressif-bot espressif-bot added Status: Done Issue is done internally Resolution: NA Issue resolution is unavailable and removed Status: Reviewing Issue is being reviewed labels Sep 18, 2024
espressif-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
…in 'version' command output

The model ESP32P4 and ESP32C5 was unknown on version command in iperf example

add model ESP32P4 and ESP32C5
which prints out model names now by the knowed model
ESP32P4 = "ESP32-P4"
ESP32C5 = "ESP32-C5"

example app: iperf

before:
iperf> version
IDF Version:v5.4-dev-2744-g59e1838270-dirty
Chip info:
        model:Unknown
        cores:1
        feature:/802.11bgn/BLE/External-Flash:8 MB
        revision number:0
iperf>

after this add model is knowed now

iperf> version
IDF Version:v5.4-dev-2744-g59e1838270-dirty
Chip info:
        model:ESP32-C5
        cores:1
        feature:/802.11bgn/BLE/External-Flash:8 MB
        revision number:0
iperf>

Merges #14593
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR-Sync-Merge Pull request sync as merge commit Resolution: NA Issue resolution is unavailable Status: Done Issue is done internally
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants