Gh user repo relationships #2
Draft
+152
−28
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Updates the readme to the new CNCF Slack workspace. Signed-off-by: Alex Chantavy <[email protected]>
danbrauer
force-pushed
the
gh_user_repo_relationships
branch
from
75d533e
to
33a20d2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Desciption TBD. This is currently on hold as we work on another PR (cartography-cncf#1378).
High level is this the feature where we will add in direct user to repo access (so, not access via team membership)
Note this is a local PR, for our fork only. The idea is to NOT MERGE THIS. Instead, once we are ready, we close this PR and open a new one pointing to upstream, and share it with them. Then they will review, approve, merge, and then we can pull in the latest from their master to ours.