Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
feat: bump swipl-wasm from 3.4.8 to 3.5.0 (#523)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Bumps [swipl-wasm](https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/npm-swipl-wasm) from 3.4.8 to 3.5.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/npm-swipl-wasm/releases)
- [Commits](SWI-Prolog/npm-swipl-wasm@v3.4.8...v3.5.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: swipl-wasm
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
  • Loading branch information
dependabot[bot] authored Aug 21, 2023
1 parent 22cb568 commit b8e61ed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 12 additions and 12 deletions.
22 changes: 11 additions & 11 deletions package-lock.json

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion package.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
},
"dependencies": {
"n3": "^1.16.3",
"swipl-wasm": "3.4.8"
"swipl-wasm": "3.5.0"
},
"peerDependencies": {
"@rdfjs/types": "^1.1.0"
Expand Down

1 comment on commit b8e61ed

@jeswr
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeswr jeswr commented on b8e61ed Aug 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'EYE JS Benchmark'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.10.

Benchmark suite Current: b8e61ed Previous: 22cb568 Ratio
Initialise SWIPL with EYE image 6.84 ops/sec (±12.90%) 9.06 ops/sec (±9.83%) 1.32
Run socrates query 6.5 ops/sec (±12.54%) 8.67 ops/sec (±9.42%) 1.33
Load data into a module 111593 ops/sec (±1.05%) 138330 ops/sec (±0.97%) 1.24
Load query into a module 126861 ops/sec (±0.79%) 162193 ops/sec (±0.23%) 1.28
Run deep taxonomy benchmark [10] 3.08 ops/sec (±8.98%) 3.74 ops/sec (±5.96%) 1.21

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

CC: @jeswr

Please sign in to comment.