Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add category to AnalysisCards #3414

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mgarrard
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
We've had a few instances come up in meetings last week that I think will make having a category useful:

  1. Allow us to group similar analysis together in the UI so everything isn't shown in one tab
  2. Allow for easy grouping of analysis in bento notebooks

Additionally, as I was implementing this, there is a TODO on base_client to find a good hueristic for which analysis to show, I think implementing that hueristic will be much easier with category.

I think this is useful enough to warrant the addition because it is distinct from level- which indicates importance - and category should still be ranked by level.

Reviewed By: mpolson64, Cesar-Cardoso

Differential Revision: D69726341

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Feb 24, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.99%. Comparing base (c64d122) to head (035d3f0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3414   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.98%   95.99%           
=======================================
  Files         539      539           
  Lines       52791    52819   +28     
=======================================
+ Hits        50674    50702   +28     
  Misses       2117     2117           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D69726341

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D69726341

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D69726341

mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#3414

We've had a few instances come up in meetings last week that I think will make having a category useful:
1. Allow us to group similar analysis together in the UI so everything isn't shown in one tab
2. Allow for easy grouping of analysis in bento notebooks

Additionally, as I was implementing this, there is a TODO on base_client to find a good hueristic for which analysis to show, I think implementing that hueristic will be much easier with category.

I think this is useful enough to warrant the addition because it is distinct from level- which indicates importance - and category should still be ranked by level.

Reviewed By: mpolson64, Cesar-Cardoso

Differential Revision: D69726341
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#3414

We've had a few instances come up in meetings last week that I think will make having a category useful:
1. Allow us to group similar analysis together in the UI so everything isn't shown in one tab
2. Allow for easy grouping of analysis in bento notebooks

Additionally, as I was implementing this, there is a TODO on base_client to find a good hueristic for which analysis to show, I think implementing that hueristic will be much easier with category.

I think this is useful enough to warrant the addition because it is distinct from level- which indicates importance - and category should still be ranked by level.

Reviewed By: mpolson64, Cesar-Cardoso

Differential Revision: D69726341
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D69726341

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 2339fb0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants