-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 171
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(bpf): add tail call to sendmmsg filler #2267
fix(bpf): add tail call to sendmmsg filler #2267
Conversation
Please double check driver/SCHEMA_VERSION file. See versioning. /hold |
Perf diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - scap file
Benchmarks diff from master
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2267 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.34% 75.33% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 279 279
Lines 34369 34369
Branches 5874 5875 +1
==========================================
- Hits 25894 25893 -1
- Misses 8475 8476 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
f4acf42
to
f7f9c0e
Compare
f7f9c0e
to
db5349e
Compare
Signed-off-by: Roberto Scolaro <[email protected]>
db5349e
to
78c5d36
Compare
I will run kernel-testing CI against this PR. |
/milestone next-driver |
All green! LGTM! Thanks for the fix! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 729681c6558c9fdd4d1e2b9528d551fe2ddbb430
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this one!
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: FedeDP, Molter73, therealbobo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/unhold |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area libscap-engine-bpf
Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?
What this PR does / why we need it:
I found a verifier failure within the legacy bpf driver with a debian 4.19 kernel. This should fix it.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: