Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve compatibility with uri-js #84

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024
Merged

Improve compatibility with uri-js #84

merged 10 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

gurgunday
Copy link
Member

@gurgunday gurgunday commented Jun 8, 2024

this test must pass if we want to merge fast-uri into ajv

I'm about to fix it, hence the PR

@gurgunday gurgunday changed the title add test Improve compatibility Jun 8, 2024
@gurgunday gurgunday changed the title Improve compatibility Improve compatibility with uri-js Jun 8, 2024
@gurgunday gurgunday requested review from zekth, climba03003 and a team June 8, 2024 12:57
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

mcollina commented Jun 8, 2024

Does this affect our benchmarks?

@zekth
Copy link
Member

zekth commented Jun 8, 2024

Is there a perf implication on this? It should have. Can't we use a different function based on env? Node vs browser?

@gurgunday gurgunday added benchmark Runs benchmark workflow and removed benchmark Runs benchmark workflow labels Jun 8, 2024
@gurgunday gurgunday added the benchmark Runs benchmark workflow label Jun 8, 2024
@gurgunday gurgunday added benchmark Runs benchmark workflow and removed benchmark Runs benchmark workflow labels Jun 8, 2024
@gurgunday gurgunday added benchmark Runs benchmark workflow and removed benchmark Runs benchmark workflow labels Jun 8, 2024
@gurgunday gurgunday added benchmark Runs benchmark workflow and removed benchmark Runs benchmark workflow labels Jun 8, 2024
@gurgunday gurgunday added benchmark Runs benchmark workflow and removed benchmark Runs benchmark workflow labels Jun 8, 2024
@gurgunday
Copy link
Member Author

gurgunday commented Jun 8, 2024

Ok bench is not working, I will look into it later

Here are the results on my machine, but Izmir is burning right now (37° celsius) so my results aren't 100% accurate — but still, I don't observe a significant drop anywhere:

PR:

fast-uri: parse domain x 1,963,346 ops/sec ±1.99% (94 runs sampled)
urijs: parse domain x 725,481 ops/sec ±0.38% (101 runs sampled)
WHATWG URL: parse domain x 4,164,643 ops/sec ±0.16% (100 runs sampled)
fast-uri: parse IPv4 x 2,869,202 ops/sec ±0.20% (101 runs sampled)
urijs: parse IPv4 x 588,070 ops/sec ±0.39% (99 runs sampled)
fast-uri: parse IPv6 x 1,309,017 ops/sec ±0.61% (101 runs sampled)
urijs: parse IPv6 x 422,369 ops/sec ±0.98% (98 runs sampled)
fast-uri: parse URN x 3,504,515 ops/sec ±1.26% (96 runs sampled)
urijs: parse URN x 1,823,102 ops/sec ±0.51% (96 runs sampled)
WHATWG URL: parse URN x 4,845,320 ops/sec ±0.43% (100 runs sampled)
fast-uri: parse URN uuid x 2,305,687 ops/sec ±0.52% (96 runs sampled)
urijs: parse URN uuid x 1,287,622 ops/sec ±0.59% (97 runs sampled)
fast-uri: serialize uri x 1,768,425 ops/sec ±0.70% (90 runs sampled)
urijs: serialize uri x 577,715 ops/sec ±3.03% (97 runs sampled)
fast-uri: serialize IPv6 x 544,162 ops/sec ±0.86% (93 runs sampled)
urijs: serialize IPv6 x 383,924 ops/sec ±0.51% (95 runs sampled)
fast-uri: serialize ws x 1,783,879 ops/sec ±0.78% (95 runs sampled)
urijs: serialize ws x 557,360 ops/sec ±0.63% (97 runs sampled)
fast-uri: resolve x 496,207 ops/sec ±1.09% (92 runs sampled)
urijs: resolve x 322,312 ops/sec ±0.89% (94 runs sampled)

Main:

fast-uri: parse domain x 1,935,556 ops/sec ±0.60% (96 runs sampled)
urijs: parse domain x 716,592 ops/sec ±0.57% (97 runs sampled)
WHATWG URL: parse domain x 4,050,297 ops/sec ±0.91% (97 runs sampled)
fast-uri: parse IPv4 x 2,752,662 ops/sec ±0.41% (97 runs sampled)
urijs: parse IPv4 x 594,033 ops/sec ±0.57% (96 runs sampled)
fast-uri: parse IPv6 x 1,314,395 ops/sec ±0.47% (97 runs sampled)
urijs: parse IPv6 x 399,563 ops/sec ±0.75% (97 runs sampled)
fast-uri: parse URN x 3,378,312 ops/sec ±0.75% (96 runs sampled)
urijs: parse URN x 1,716,716 ops/sec ±1.06% (93 runs sampled)
WHATWG URL: parse URN x 4,666,504 ops/sec ±0.67% (97 runs sampled)
fast-uri: parse URN uuid x 2,283,147 ops/sec ±0.83% (98 runs sampled)
urijs: parse URN uuid x 1,227,278 ops/sec ±0.89% (93 runs sampled)
fast-uri: serialize uri x 1,264,827 ops/sec ±0.71% (91 runs sampled)
urijs: serialize uri x 556,325 ops/sec ±0.98% (91 runs sampled)
fast-uri: serialize IPv6 x 484,639 ops/sec ±0.99% (91 runs sampled)
urijs: serialize IPv6 x 351,026 ops/sec ±1.50% (93 runs sampled)
fast-uri: serialize ws x 1,296,084 ops/sec ±1.59% (92 runs sampled)
urijs: serialize ws x 520,719 ops/sec ±0.97% (87 runs sampled)
fast-uri: resolve x 407,145 ops/sec ±1.02% (88 runs sampled)
urijs: resolve x 304,759 ops/sec ±0.62% (90 runs sampled)

@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ function parse (uri, opts) {
parsed.host = unescape(parsed.host)
}
if (parsed.path !== undefined && parsed.path.length) {
parsed.path = encodeURI(parsed.path)
parsed.path = escape(unescape(parsed.path))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you elaborate this change?

These functions are deprecated:

> escape(unescape('шеллы'))
'%u0448%u0435%u043B%u043B%u044B'
> encodeURI('шеллы')
'%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BB%D1%8B'

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey,

So I want to start by saying that I fully agree with you in that deprecated functions should be avoided in general, but they have different behavior as you pointed out and this change is to achieve url-js compatibility (one of the goals of this library) — you can see that escape and unescape have already been used many times in this file:

fast-uri/index.js

Lines 265 to 274 in bf03d44

if (!schemeHandler || (schemeHandler && !schemeHandler.skipNormalize)) {
if (gotEncoding && parsed.scheme !== undefined) {
parsed.scheme = unescape(parsed.scheme)
}
if (gotEncoding && parsed.userinfo !== undefined) {
parsed.userinfo = unescape(parsed.userinfo)
}
if (gotEncoding && parsed.host !== undefined) {
parsed.host = unescape(parsed.host)
}

In fact, if I recall correctly, someone tried to change these functions to encode/decodeURI, and maybe the tests didn't catch the behavior change for path

Having said all that, I don't think these functions will ever be removed from the Web

@gurgunday gurgunday requested a review from Eomm June 9, 2024 19:22
Copy link
Member

@zekth zekth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✌️

@gurgunday
Copy link
Member Author

Be 100% compatible with uri-js

Because we have this in the Todos/Goals, I feel it should be bugfix/patch release

Does anyone object?

Cc @fastify/libraries @fastify/plugins

@mcollina mcollina merged commit b8b98b1 into fastify:main Jun 10, 2024
26 checks passed
@gurgunday gurgunday deleted the compat branch June 10, 2024 12:36
@jasoniangreen
Copy link

Thanks all, I will prepare a new release of AJV with fast-uri. Let's try and fix forward if anything else comes up.

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

Absolutely!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants