Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify TimeStepper interface #122

Merged
merged 70 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025
Merged

Unify TimeStepper interface #122

merged 70 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

pbrubeck
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@pbrubeck pbrubeck force-pushed the pbrubeck/unify-timesteppers branch from f1c9b84 to 2c2a125 Compare March 1, 2025 20:14
@pbrubeck pbrubeck force-pushed the pbrubeck/unify-timesteppers branch from 2c2a125 to 2fcc1a1 Compare March 1, 2025 20:29
@pbrubeck pbrubeck force-pushed the pbrubeck/unify-timesteppers branch from 1d9b579 to bf75275 Compare March 1, 2025 21:00
@pbrubeck pbrubeck force-pushed the pbrubeck/unify-timesteppers branch from bf75275 to ca3f05b Compare March 1, 2025 21:01
@pbrubeck pbrubeck force-pushed the pbrubeck/unify-timesteppers branch from 38a69f4 to 58cfb8b Compare March 2, 2025 17:06
@rckirby rckirby requested a review from ScottMacLachlan March 3, 2025 03:30
Copy link
Collaborator

@ScottMacLachlan ScottMacLachlan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside from some documentation questions, this looks like it is in great shape to me. Many thanks!

@pbrubeck pbrubeck force-pushed the pbrubeck/unify-timesteppers branch from 32e357b to 69c96a7 Compare March 3, 2025 14:01
@rckirby rckirby merged commit 4211e8a into master Mar 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@rckirby rckirby deleted the pbrubeck/unify-timesteppers branch March 3, 2025 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants