Update Readme.md

[Satarupa22-SD]

update contribution guidelines.

• Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• The commit message follows our guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

• What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

• Bug fix
• Feature implementation
• Doc updates

• Related Issue

#114

• What changes have you introduced?
  update contributing guidelines

• Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
  No

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the Readme.md file in the collaborate directory to provide more comprehensive contribution guidelines for the PSLab project. The changes focus on expanding the existing content and adding new sections to guide potential contributors through various aspects of the contribution process.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Expanded and restructured the contribution guidelines	Added a welcome message and introduction to the PSLab project Expanded the section on creating experiments Added information about file formats (Markdown and reStructuredText) Included a section on recommended editing tools Added detailed instructions for reporting bugs Included guidelines for suggesting enhancements Added a section on making first code contributions Expanded the pull request guidelines Added a section on the submission process for contributions	collaborate/Readme.md

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @Satarupa22-SD - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider reorganizing the content for better flow and readability. The current structure jumps between topics and could be more logically ordered.
• Ensure consistency in the information about tools. The mention of notex seems out of place and could be integrated into the 'Editing Tools' section or removed.
• Review the removed content from the original README to ensure no valuable information was lost in the update.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[orangecms]

Sorry, no idea what this annoying bot is about.
I don't agree with it.