-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Type inference #2
Draft
PPER
wants to merge
63
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
dev
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Can you empty out master and set it up so that the diff for this PR shows all of the code? |
I can not clear all commits in a branch, so I left the first commit in master. The first commit is just to upload the latex template, so it's not necessary to show in PR. (If I delete master and set a new, I'm worried there will be something I cannot handle when merging) |
…ntermediate status denoting something is potentially solved or unsolved. added utyp stuff which essentially lets you reference the side of a hole. changed unify_one and add_result so dependencies weren't overwritten and were done in oth directions if holes exist on both sides of a constraint. WIP- doesn't compile yet
…es to be accumulated along with those for type variables; the former acts as a record for the latter
…trees of union find clusters with where children are partially informed by their parent's status (ie only if it is in their branch) and parents are entirely informed by their children's status. wouldn't need topological sorting and would be easy to resolve due to union find's clusters. a little sad if this works since it may make all the top-sort work not very useful, but its a nice abstraction I think lol. I'm thinking I should finish the top-sort implementation and shift once it works since I think it is getting close
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.