Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Data Package (v2) blog post #919

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024
Merged

Add Data Package (v2) blog post #919

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024

Conversation

sapetti9
Copy link
Collaborator

Adds an announcement blog of Data Package v2 release. @roll can you please have a look and add anything you think it's relevant here? Please check links (especially to the Metadata mapper) are the right ones. Thank you!

Announcement blog of Data Package v2 release
@sapetti9 sapetti9 requested a review from roll June 26, 2024 13:26
@roll roll requested a review from peterdesmet June 26, 2024 13:40
Copy link
Member

@roll roll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are a great write @sapetti9!

I added a few minor comments, also add Peter to the reviwers

site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
description: We are very excited to announce the release of Data Package v2
author: Sara Petti
---
We are very excited to announce the release of the version 2.0 of the Frictionless Standard. Thanks to the generous support of [NLnet](https://nlnet.nl/) from November last year we were able to [focus on reviewing the Frictionless Standard](https://frictionlessdata.io/blog/2023/11/15/frictionless-specs-update/#additional-deliverables) in order to include features that were often requested throughout the years and improve extensibility for domain-specific implementations.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if now we need to mix this Fricitionless / Data Package Standard. Maybe we just need to mention that during the work, the new name was established to avoid confusion.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think the "We are very excited to announce the release of the version 2.0 of Data Package (previously known as Frictionless Specs)" would work better?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, something like this


If you are curious and would like to know more details about what changes with version 2, go and have a look at the [Changelog](https://datapackage.org/overview/changelog/) we published.

To increase and facilitate adoption, we published a [metadata mapper written in Python](https://github.com/frictionlessdata/dplib-py). We have also worked on Data Package integrations for the most notable open data portals out there. We therefore proposed a Data Package serializer to [Invenio RDM](https://inveniordm.web.cern.ch/), created a pull request that exposes `datapackage.json` as a metadata export target in the [Open Science Framework](https://www.cos.io/) system, and built an extension that adds a `datapackage.json` endpoint to every dataset in [CKAN](https://github.com/frictionlessdata/ckanext-datapackage).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would mention Invenio RDM / Zenodo together

Integrated your feedback @roll. Have a look and see what you think.
@sapetti9
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sapetti9 commented Jun 26, 2024

Thanks for the super useful feedback @roll. I updated the blog to integrate it, let me know what you think.

Copy link
Member

@roll roll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @sapetti9 !

A few more smaller comments

site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Integrating additional feedback from @roll.
@sapetti9
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @roll! I've integrated your feedback in the new version.

Copy link
Member

@peterdesmet peterdesmet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice post, made some suggestions to clarify some aspects.

site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/blog/2024-06-26-datapackage-v2-release/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@roll
Copy link
Member

roll commented Jun 26, 2024

The site is ready to be linked from the announcement (we just need to incorporate Peter's suggestions)

Integrating @peterdesmet feedback in the blog.
@sapetti9
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Just added all the great input from @peterdesmet in the last version (thank you!). @roll have a look an merge if you think it's ready to go.

@roll roll changed the title Create README.md Add Data Package (v2) blog post Jun 26, 2024
@roll roll merged commit 64ef71e into main Jun 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@roll roll deleted the sapetti9-patch-2 branch June 26, 2024 16:13
@roll
Copy link
Member

roll commented Jun 26, 2024

Thanks! Merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants